You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Dan Carwin <dc...@covalent.net> on 2006/11/06 19:54:04 UTC

reply_timeout

Is reply_timeout designed to be set...

1. only for the loadbalancing worker.
2. for every worker except the loadbalancer.
3. for every worker including the loadbalancer.

Thanks,
Dan Carwin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: reply_timeout

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Good question (we need to add the distinction lb/usual worker) to the
docs page for the advanced worker parameters.

The answer is: Number 2.

Regards,

Rainer

Dan Carwin schrieb:
> Is reply_timeout designed to be set...
> 
> 1. only for the loadbalancing worker.
> 2. for every worker except the loadbalancer.
> 3. for every worker including the loadbalancer.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan Carwin
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org