You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io> on 2019/04/09 00:26:01 UTC

[VOTE] KIP-445: In-memory session store

Hello all,

There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for a vote on
KIP-445, augmenting our session store options with an in-memory version.
This would round out our store API to offer in-memory and persistent
versions of all three types of stores.

KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-445%3A+In-memory+Session+Store
PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8029

This would also open up the possibility of migrating some of the
unit/integration tests to in-memory stores to speed things up a bit ;)

Cheers,
Sophie

Re: [VOTE] KIP-445: In-memory session store

Posted by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>.
Hi all,

This KIP passes with three +1 (binding) -- thanks Matthias, Bill, and
Guozhang!

For those interested, feel free to check out and join the ongoing PR review
here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525

Cheers,
Sophie

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:21 PM Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding).
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:46 PM Bill Bejeck <bb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP Sophie.
> >
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:14 AM Matthias J. Sax <ma...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the KIP Sophie!
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 4/8/19 5:26 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for a vote on
> > > > KIP-445, augmenting our session store options with an in-memory
> > version.
> > > > This would round out our store API to offer in-memory and persistent
> > > > versions of all three types of stores.
> > > >
> > > > KIP:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-445%3A+In-memory+Session+Store
> > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525
> > > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8029
> > > >
> > > > This would also open up the possibility of migrating some of the
> > > > unit/integration tests to in-memory stores to speed things up a bit
> ;)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Sophie
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-445: In-memory session store

Posted by Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding).

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:46 PM Bill Bejeck <bb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP Sophie.
>
> +1(binding)
>
> -Bill
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:14 AM Matthias J. Sax <ma...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP Sophie!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 4/8/19 5:26 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for a vote on
> > > KIP-445, augmenting our session store options with an in-memory
> version.
> > > This would round out our store API to offer in-memory and persistent
> > > versions of all three types of stores.
> > >
> > > KIP:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-445%3A+In-memory+Session+Store
> > > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525
> > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8029
> > >
> > > This would also open up the possibility of migrating some of the
> > > unit/integration tests to in-memory stores to speed things up a bit ;)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Sophie
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Re: [VOTE] KIP-445: In-memory session store

Posted by Bill Bejeck <bb...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the KIP Sophie.

+1(binding)

-Bill

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:14 AM Matthias J. Sax <ma...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Thanks for the KIP Sophie!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 4/8/19 5:26 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for a vote on
> > KIP-445, augmenting our session store options with an in-memory version.
> > This would round out our store API to offer in-memory and persistent
> > versions of all three types of stores.
> >
> > KIP:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-445%3A+In-memory+Session+Store
> > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525
> > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8029
> >
> > This would also open up the possibility of migrating some of the
> > unit/integration tests to in-memory stores to speed things up a bit ;)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sophie
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-445: In-memory session store

Posted by "Matthias J. Sax" <ma...@confluent.io>.
Thanks for the KIP Sophie!

+1 (binding)


-Matthias

On 4/8/19 5:26 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for a vote on
> KIP-445, augmenting our session store options with an in-memory version.
> This would round out our store API to offer in-memory and persistent
> versions of all three types of stores.
> 
> KIP:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-445%3A+In-memory+Session+Store
> PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525
> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8029
> 
> This would also open up the possibility of migrating some of the
> unit/integration tests to in-memory stores to speed things up a bit ;)
> 
> Cheers,
> Sophie
>