You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "Bennett, Tony - CNF" <Be...@cnf.com> on 2004/10/19 04:03:37 UTC
Is there a limit to using "with-module" directive ???
I have tried "adding" two different home-grown modules
to be statically linked when attempting to configure httpd 2.0.52 on AIX
5.1.
My configure command:
CC="xlc_r"; export CC
CPPFLAGS="-D_THREAD_SAFE"; export CPPFLAGS
"./configure" \
"--prefix=/usr/local/apache" \
"--with-mpm=worker" \
"--without-berkeley-db" \
"--enable-dav=static" \
"--enable-dav_fs=static" \
"--with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl" \
"--enable-ssl=static" \
"--with-egd=/etc/entropy" \
"--with-module=aaa:dms_apr" \
"--with-module=aaa:auth_extern" \
"$@"
It only builds the module specified in the last "--with-module"
directive.
Is this a limitation with that directive ???
If so, how do I "add" two modules that are to be statically linked...?
Thanks,
-tony
Re: Is there a limit to using "with-module" directive ???
Posted by Erik Abele <er...@codefaktor.de>.
On 19.10.2004, at 04:03, Bennett, Tony - CNF wrote:
> I have tried "adding" two different home-grown modules
> to be statically linked when attempting to configure httpd 2.0.52 on
> AIX 5.1.
>
> My configure command:
> ...
> It only builds the module specified in the last "--with-module"
> directive.
> Is this a limitation with that directive ???
>
> If so, how do I "add" two modules that are to be statically linked…?
This should be working now with the current SVN trunk (2.1.x), see
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?root=Apache-SVN&rev=124600&view=rev
Just use
--with-module=module-type1:module-file1,module-type2:module-file2 to
add two or more external modules - you can find a description at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/programs/configure.html - would be
nice to hear the results...
Cheers,
Erik
Re: Is there a limit to using "with-module" directive ???
Posted by Rici Lake <ri...@ricilake.net>.
On 18-Oct-04, at 9:03 PM, Bennett, Tony - CNF wrote:
> It only builds the module specified in the last "--with-module"
> directive.
> Is this a limitation with that directive ???
Yes, the directive only handles one module.