You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2016/07/13 05:46:12 UTC
[DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Hello All,
I would like to release 3.1.2
pros:
1) more than 40 issues were resolved
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
3) lot's of time passed since last release
cons:
1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
WDYT?
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Signature will be created only after successful VOTE on release, please see
http://openmeetings.apache.org/ReleaseGuide.html
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:52 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> cc @dev
>
> 2016-07-13 18:52 GMT+12:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Had no chance to do a signature test yet but RTMPs status is no blocker
> > for me. It's an issue with the Red5 libraries, so not a lot what you can
> do.
> >
> > I think also more smaller releases are better then less bigger ones.
> >
> > Seb
> >
> > 2016-07-13 18:49 GMT+12:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> from my point of view, we wouldn't change the current situation with the
> >> signing issue.
> >>
> >> I don't know, how often RTMPS is used...
> >>
> >> If it will be released both things need to be communicated in a way,
> that
> >> is hard to overlook it.
> >>
> >> From me +1
> >>
> >> Greetings Peter
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 13.07.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> I would like to release 3.1.2
> >>
> >> pros:
> >> 1) more than 40 issues were resolved
> >> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
> >> 2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
> >> 3) lot's of time passed since last release
> >>
> >> cons:
> >> 1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Signature will be created only after successful VOTE on release, please see
http://openmeetings.apache.org/ReleaseGuide.html
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:52 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> cc @dev
>
> 2016-07-13 18:52 GMT+12:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Had no chance to do a signature test yet but RTMPs status is no blocker
> > for me. It's an issue with the Red5 libraries, so not a lot what you can
> do.
> >
> > I think also more smaller releases are better then less bigger ones.
> >
> > Seb
> >
> > 2016-07-13 18:49 GMT+12:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>:
> >
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >>
> >> from my point of view, we wouldn't change the current situation with the
> >> signing issue.
> >>
> >> I don't know, how often RTMPS is used...
> >>
> >> If it will be released both things need to be communicated in a way,
> that
> >> is hard to overlook it.
> >>
> >> From me +1
> >>
> >> Greetings Peter
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 13.07.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> I would like to release 3.1.2
> >>
> >> pros:
> >> 1) more than 40 issues were resolved
> >> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
> >> 2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
> >> 3) lot's of time passed since last release
> >>
> >> cons:
> >> 1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
cc @dev
2016-07-13 18:52 GMT+12:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
> Had no chance to do a signature test yet but RTMPs status is no blocker
> for me. It's an issue with the Red5 libraries, so not a lot what you can do.
>
> I think also more smaller releases are better then less bigger ones.
>
> Seb
>
> 2016-07-13 18:49 GMT+12:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> from my point of view, we wouldn't change the current situation with the
>> signing issue.
>>
>> I don't know, how often RTMPS is used...
>>
>> If it will be released both things need to be communicated in a way, that
>> is hard to overlook it.
>>
>> From me +1
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 13.07.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I would like to release 3.1.2
>>
>> pros:
>> 1) more than 40 issues were resolved
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
>> 2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
>> 3) lot's of time passed since last release
>>
>> cons:
>> 1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
cc @dev
2016-07-13 18:52 GMT+12:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
> Had no chance to do a signature test yet but RTMPs status is no blocker
> for me. It's an issue with the Red5 libraries, so not a lot what you can do.
>
> I think also more smaller releases are better then less bigger ones.
>
> Seb
>
> 2016-07-13 18:49 GMT+12:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> from my point of view, we wouldn't change the current situation with the
>> signing issue.
>>
>> I don't know, how often RTMPS is used...
>>
>> If it will be released both things need to be communicated in a way, that
>> is hard to overlook it.
>>
>> From me +1
>>
>> Greetings Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 13.07.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I would like to release 3.1.2
>>
>> pros:
>> 1) more than 40 issues were resolved
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
>> 2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
>> 3) lot's of time passed since last release
>>
>> cons:
>> 1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Had no chance to do a signature test yet but RTMPs status is no blocker for
me. It's an issue with the Red5 libraries, so not a lot what you can do.
I think also more smaller releases are better then less bigger ones.
Seb
2016-07-13 18:49 GMT+12:00 Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> from my point of view, we wouldn't change the current situation with the
> signing issue.
>
> I don't know, how often RTMPS is used...
>
> If it will be released both things need to be communicated in a way, that
> is hard to overlook it.
>
> From me +1
>
> Greetings Peter
>
>
> Am 13.07.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to release 3.1.2
>
> pros:
> 1) more than 40 issues were resolved
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
> 2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
> 3) lot's of time passed since last release
>
> cons:
> 1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] 3.1.2 release
Posted by Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de>.
Hi Maxim,
from my point of view, we wouldn't change the current situation with the
signing issue.
I don't know, how often RTMPS is used...
If it will be released both things need to be communicated in a way,
that is hard to overlook it.
From me +1
Greetings Peter
Am 13.07.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to release 3.1.2
>
> pros:
> 1) more than 40 issues were resolved
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312720&version=12335347
> 2) this release will have signed Screen Sharing Application
> 3) lot's of time passed since last release
>
> cons:
> 1) no stable RTMPS support yet :(
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax