You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> on 2008/04/15 10:24:59 UTC

Re: svn commit: r648166 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM,  <gd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: gdamour
>  Date: Tue Apr 15 01:16:50 2008
>  New Revision: 648166
>
>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648166&view=rev
>  Log:
>  as pointed out by Donald, all WADI versions should have been upgraded to 2.0-M10

Wouldn't it be easier to introduce a variable so the change would've
boiled down to updating it only? Just like derbyVersion oraz
openejbVersion.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: svn commit: r648166 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/pom.xml

Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.

I am of the same opinion.  It will also help in avoiding similar errors in
future.

++Vamsi

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM,  <gd...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: gdamour
> >  Date: Tue Apr 15 01:16:50 2008
> >  New Revision: 648166
> >
> >  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648166&view=rev
> >  Log:
> >  as pointed out by Donald, all WADI versions should have been upgraded
> to 2.0-M10
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to introduce a variable so the change would've
> boiled down to updating it only? Just like derbyVersion oraz
> openejbVersion.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>