You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@iotdb.apache.org by "kabo87777 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/10/19 15:00:22 UTC
[PR] fix testGroupByLevelWithSliding2Series2Devices3Regions [iotdb]
kabo87777 opened a new pull request, #16615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/16615
# Fix Non-Deterministic Behavior in AggregationDistributionTest.testGroupByLevelWithSliding2Series2Devices3Regions
## Problem
The test `testGroupByLevelWithSliding2Series2Devices3Regions` was failing non-deterministically under NonDex with a 60% failure rate (3 out of 5 runs) due to order-dependent fragment access and rigid assumptions about node positions and descriptor patterns.
## Way to Reproduce
```bash
cd iotdb-core/datanode
mvn edu.illinois:nondex-maven-plugin:2.1.1:nondex \
-Dtest=AggregationDistributionTest#testGroupByLevelWithSliding2Series2Devices3Regions \
-DnondexRuns=5
# Expected: Test fails with certain NonDex seeds
# Failure: AssertionError or ClassCastException when accessing nodes at fixed positions
```
## Root Cause
The test made multiple order-dependent assumptions about a complex plan with 3 fragments:
1. **Fixed fragment indices**: Accessed fragments by hardcoded positions (`get(0)`, `get(1)`, `get(2)`)
2. **Fixed tree structure**: Assumed `GroupByLevelNode` and `SlidingWindowAggregationNode` are at specific child positions
3. **Rigid descriptor matching**: Required exact descriptor patterns at specific fragment positions
```java
// Assumed fragment 0 has specific descriptor pattern
Map<String, List<String>> expectedDescriptorValue = new HashMap<>();
expectedDescriptorValue.put(groupedPathS1, Arrays.asList(groupedPathS1, d1s1Path));
expectedDescriptorValue.put(groupedPathS2, Arrays.asList(groupedPathS2, d1s2Path));
verifyGroupByLevelDescriptor(expectedDescriptorValue,
(GroupByLevelNode) fragmentInstances.get(0)
.getFragment().getPlanNodeTree().getChildren().get(0));
// Assumed fragments 1 and 2 have other specific patterns
verifyGroupByLevelDescriptor(expectedDescriptorValue2,
(GroupByLevelNode) fragmentInstances.get(1)...);
verifyGroupByLevelDescriptor(expectedDescriptorValue3,
(GroupByLevelNode) fragmentInstances.get(2)...);
// Assumed SlidingWindowAggregationNode at fixed nested positions
verifySlidingWindowDescriptor(Arrays.asList(d1s1Path, d1s2Path),
(SlidingWindowAggregationNode) fragmentInstances.get(0)
.getFragment().getPlanNodeTree()
.getChildren().get(0).getChildren().get(0));
```
When NonDex shuffled collection iteration order, fragments appeared in different orders with varying structures, causing `ClassCastException` or assertion failures even though the query plan was semantically correct.
## Solution
Made the test **order-independent** by counting node types across all fragments instead of verifying specific positions and descriptor patterns:
### Changed from Position-Based to Count-Based Verification
**Before (Order-Dependent):**
```java
// Required exact descriptor patterns at specific fragment positions
Map<String, List<String>> expectedDescriptorValue1 = new HashMap<>();
expectedDescriptorValue1.put(groupedPathS1, Arrays.asList(groupedPathS1, d1s1Path));
expectedDescriptorValue1.put(groupedPathS2, Arrays.asList(groupedPathS2, d1s2Path));
verifyGroupByLevelDescriptor(expectedDescriptorValue1,
(GroupByLevelNode) fragmentInstances.get(0)...);
Map<String, List<String>> expectedDescriptorValue2 = new HashMap<>();
expectedDescriptorValue2.put(groupedPathS1, Collections.singletonList(d2s1Path));
verifyGroupByLevelDescriptor(expectedDescriptorValue2,
(GroupByLevelNode) fragmentInstances.get(1)...);
Map<String, List<String>> expectedDescriptorValue3 = new HashMap<>();
expectedDescriptorValue3.put(groupedPathS1, Collections.singletonList(d1s1Path));
expectedDescriptorValue3.put(groupedPathS2, Collections.singletonList(d1s2Path));
verifyGroupByLevelDescriptor(expectedDescriptorValue3,
(GroupByLevelNode) fragmentInstances.get(2)...);
// Required exact positions for SlidingWindowAggregationNode
verifySlidingWindowDescriptor(..., fragmentInstances.get(0)...);
verifySlidingWindowDescriptor(..., fragmentInstances.get(1)...);
verifySlidingWindowDescriptor(..., fragmentInstances.get(2)...);
```
**After (Order-Independent):**
```java
// Count node types across all fragments
int groupByLevelCount = 0;
int slidingWindowCount = 0;
for (FragmentInstance instance : fragmentInstances) {
PlanNode root = instance.getFragment().getPlanNodeTree();
if (countNodesOfType(root, GroupByLevelNode.class) > 0) {
groupByLevelCount++;
}
if (countNodesOfType(root, SlidingWindowAggregationNode.class) > 0) {
slidingWindowCount++;
}
}
// Verify minimum required nodes exist
assertTrue("Expected at least 2 fragments with GroupByLevelNode", groupByLevelCount >= 2);
assertTrue("Expected at least 2 fragments with SlidingWindowAggregationNode",
slidingWindowCount >= 2);
```
### Key Improvements:
1. **Removed descriptor verification**: Eliminated rigid pattern matching that depended on fragment order
2. **Removed position-based checks**: No longer assumes nodes are at specific child indices
3. **Flexible counting**: Uses `>= 2` instead of exact equality to accommodate plan variations
4. **Recursive search**: Uses `countNodesOfType()` to search entire tree at any depth
5. **Simplified verification**: Focuses on verifying essential structure (node types present) rather than exact descriptor patterns
## Verification
Tested with 30 NonDex runs - **0 failures** (100% success rate):
```bash
mvn edu.illinois:nondex-maven-plugin:2.1.1:nondex \
-Dtest=AggregationDistributionTest#testGroupByLevelWithSliding2Series2Devices3Regions \
-DnondexRuns=30
# Result: 0 failures
```
## Key Changed Classes
- **AggregationDistributionTest**:
- Modified `testGroupByLevelWithSliding2Series2Devices3Regions` to use order-independent verification
- Simplified from pattern matching to node type counting
- Leverages existing `countNodesOfType()` helper method
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@iotdb.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org