You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2013/05/10 09:46:46 UTC
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Hi folks!
I'll reroll the release this evening.
We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release but we don't ship any binaries for it.
The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without passing the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a compat package.
The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few other minor things.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
> To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>
>T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>
> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the release.
>
> Cheers,
> Arne
>
> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
> <hw...@gmail.com>:
>
>> -1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>>
>> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>>
>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>>
>> public void addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>> annotatedType)
>> {
>>
>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTyp
>> e);
>> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>> }
>>
>> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Harald
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
The change in TomEE covered it up, but didn't fix the root issue. Added a test case in OWB that reproduces it using just the BeanManager.
-David
On May 11, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 David, it was already fixed and was a tomee issue!
> Le 11 mai 2013 05:29, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Excellent. Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a
>> few days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe). Was causing
>> java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
>>
>> Hopefully we can get that in there. Out of time tonight, but would like
>> to find the issue with passivation checking.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On May 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
>>>> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark
>> Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>>>
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> You can build it from trunk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Arne
>>>>
>>>> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
>>>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
>>>>> I would try it with my current app.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source
>> release
>>>>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without
>>>> passing
>>>>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
>>>>>> compat
>>>>>> package.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> minor things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
>>>>>>> To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org"
>>>> <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Arne
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
>>>>>>> <hw...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>>>>>>>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> public void
>>>> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>>>>>>>> annotatedType)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
>>>>>> p
>>>>>>>> e);
>>>>>>>> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Harald
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
-1 David, it was already fixed and was a tomee issue!
Le 11 mai 2013 05:29, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Excellent. Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a
> few days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe). Was causing
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
>
> Hopefully we can get that in there. Out of time tonight, but would like
> to find the issue with passivation checking.
>
>
> -David
>
> On May 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
> >> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark
> Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
> >>
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> You can build it from trunk
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Arne
> >>
> >> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
> >> <an...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
> >>> I would try it with my current app.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi folks!
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
> >>>>
> >>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source
> release
> >>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without
> >> passing
> >>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
> >>>> compat
> >>>> package.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
> >>>> other
> >>>> minor things.
> >>>>
> >>>> LieGrue,
> >>>> strub
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
> >>>>> To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org"
> >> <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> >>>>> Cc:
> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> T hanks Harald for catching this one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the
> >> release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Arne
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
> >>>>> <hw...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Looks like there is a regression regarding
> >>>>>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Adding more than one type has no effect.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> public void
> >> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
> >>>>>> annotatedType)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
> >>>> p
> >>>>>> e);
> >>>>>> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All additional types are added with the same null key.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>> Harald
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Excellent. Fixed an issue in OWB that was affecting the TomEE build for a few days (OWB-858 - AnnotatedTypeImpl not thread safe). Was causing java.util.ConcurrentModificationExceptions.
Hopefully we can get that in there. Out of time tonight, but would like to find the issue with passivation checking.
-David
On May 10, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
>> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> You can build it from trunk
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arne
>>
>> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
>> <an...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
>>> I would try it with my current app.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>
>>>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>>>>
>>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release
>>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>>>>
>>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without
>> passing
>>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
>>>> compat
>>>> package.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
>>>> other
>>>> minor things.
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
>>>>> To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org"
>> <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>>>>
>>>>> T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the
>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Arne
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
>>>>> <hw...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>>>>>> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public void
>> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>>>>>> annotatedType)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
>>>> p
>>>>>> e);
>>>>>> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Harald
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Yea, but I need to reset the versions to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
> To: "dev@openwebbeans.apache.org" <de...@openwebbeans.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, 10 May 2013, 15:33
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> You can build it from trunk
>
>
> Regards,
> Arne
>
> Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
> <an...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
>> I would try it with my current app.
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>>>
>>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release
>>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>>>
>>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without
> passing
>>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
>>> compat
>>> package.
>>>
>>>
>>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
>>> other
>>> minor things.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> > From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
>>> > To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org"
> <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>>> > Cc:
>>> > Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
>>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>>> >
>>> >T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>>> >
>>> > That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the
> release.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Arne
>>> >
>>> > Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
>>> > <hw...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >> -1 (non-binding)
>>> >>
>>> >> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>>> >> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>>> >>
>>> >> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>>> >>
>>> >> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>>> >>
>>> >> public void
> addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>>> >> annotatedType)
>>> >> {
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
>>> p
>>> >> e);
>>> >> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>>> >> }
>>> >>
>>> >> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >> Harald
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Posted by Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>.
Hi Thomas,
You can build it from trunk
Regards,
Arne
Am 10.05.13 13:36 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" unter
<an...@gmail.com>:
>Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
>I would try it with my current app.
>
>
>2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>>
>> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release
>> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>>
>> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without passing
>> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a
>>compat
>> package.
>>
>>
>> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few
>>other
>> minor things.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
>> > To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
>> >
>> >T hanks Harald for catching this one.
>> >
>> > That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the release.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Arne
>> >
>> > Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
>> > <hw...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> -1 (non-binding)
>> >>
>> >> Looks like there is a regression regarding
>> >> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
>> >>
>> >> Adding more than one type has no effect.
>> >>
>> >> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
>> >>
>> >> public void addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
>> >> annotatedType)
>> >> {
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTy
>>p
>> >> e);
>> >> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> All additional types are added with the same null key.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Harald
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Is there already a new snapshot available somewhere?
I would try it with my current app.
2013/5/10 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Hi folks!
>
> I'll reroll the release this evening.
>
> We will _not_ exclude the webbeans-cdi11 module from the source release
> but we don't ship any binaries for it.
>
> The reason is that we must not ship any CDI-1.1 binaries without passing
> the TCK. But there is no reason not to ship a mechanism to create a compat
> package.
>
>
> The reroll will contain Arnes fixes for the AnnotatedType and a few other
> minor things.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>
> > To: "user@openwebbeans.apache.org" <us...@openwebbeans.apache.org>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, 9 May 2013, 18:32
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.2.0
> >
> >T hanks Harald for catching this one.
> >
> > That's a serious one. I'll fix it and we re-roll the release.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Arne
> >
> > Am 09.05.13 18:15 schrieb "Harald Wellmann" unter
> > <hw...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> -1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Looks like there is a regression regarding
> >> BeforeBeanDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(), compared to 1.1.8.
> >>
> >> Adding more than one type has no effect.
> >>
> >> The following method in BeanManagerImpl looks suspicious:
> >>
> >> public void addAdditionalAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>
> >> annotatedType)
> >> {
> >>
> >>
> webBeansContext.getAnnotatedElementFactory().setAnnotatedType(annotatedTyp
> >> e);
> >> additionalAnnotatedTypes.put(null, annotatedType);
> >> }
> >>
> >> All additional types are added with the same null key.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Harald
> >>
> >>
> >
>