You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Yoshiki Hayashi <yo...@xemacs.org> on 2001/05/28 12:57:18 UTC
[PATCH] Typo fix
I think this is correct fix but I'm not really comfortable
with my English. :-) Could someone review this change?
Index: mod_so.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_so.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 mod_so.html
--- mod_so.html 2000/12/20 23:48:34 1.9
+++ mod_so.html 2001/05/28 10:39:51
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
The LoadFile directive links in the named object files or libraries
when the server is started or restarted; this is used to load
additional code which may be required for some module to
-work. <EM>Filename</EM> is either and absolute path or relative to <A
+work. <EM>Filename</EM> is either an absolute path or relative to <A
HREF="core.html#serverroot">ServerRoot</A>.<P><HR>
<H2><A NAME="loadmodule">LoadModule</A> directive</H2>
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
<P>Win32 Apache modules are often distributed with the old style names,
or even a name such as libfoo.dll. Whatever the name of the module,
-it must be the LoadModule directive requires the exact filename, no
+the LoadModule directive requires the exact filename, no
assumption is made about the filename extension.</P>
<!--#include virtual="footer.html" -->
Index: mod_unique_id.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_unique_id.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 mod_unique_id.html
--- mod_unique_id.html 2000/09/28 16:54:39 1.5
+++ mod_unique_id.html 2001/05/28 10:39:52
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
repeated itself). This is not a perfect defense.
<P>
-How good a defense is it? Well suppose that one of your machines serves
+How good a defense is it? We'll suppose that one of your machines serves
at most 500 requests per second (which is a very reasonable upper bound
at this writing, because systems generally do more than just shovel out
static files). To do that it will require a number of children which
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@
<P>
The <CODE>UNIQUE_ID</CODE> environment variable is constructed by
encoding the 112-bit (32-bit IP address, 32 bit pid, 32 bit time stamp,
-16 bit counter) quadruple using the alphabet <CODE>[A-Za-z0-9@-]</CODE>
+16 bit counter quadruple) using the alphabet <CODE>[A-Za-z0-9@-]</CODE>
in a manner similar to MIME base64 encoding, producing 19 characters.
The MIME base64 alphabet is actually <CODE>[A-Za-z0-9+/]</CODE> however
<CODE>+</CODE> and <CODE>/</CODE> need to be specially encoded in URLs,
--
Yoshiki Hayashi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org
Re: [PATCH] Typo fix
Posted by jo...@slive.ca.
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Not good. "Well suppose" should be "Well, suppose".
[...]
> Not good. The phrase is "112-bit quadruple" with an enclosed
> parenthetical explanation. The original text is correct.
Woops... I had already committed the whole thing. I guess I should be
more careful. I'm correcting now.
Joshua.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org
Re: [PATCH] Typo fix
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
Yoshiki Hayashi wrote:
>
> I think this is correct fix but I'm not really comfortable
> with my English. :-) Could someone review this change?
Did not see any reply to this. Some are good, some are not:
> -work. <EM>Filename</EM> is either and absolute path or relative to <A
> +work. <EM>Filename</EM> is either an absolute path or relative to <A
Good.
> -it must be the LoadModule directive requires the exact filename, no
> +the LoadModule directive requires the exact filename, no
Good.
> -How good a defense is it? Well suppose that one of your machines serves
> +How good a defense is it? We'll suppose that one of your machines serves
Not good. "Well suppose" should be "Well, suppose".
> encoding the 112-bit (32-bit IP address, 32 bit pid, 32 bit time stamp,
> -16 bit counter) quadruple using the alphabet <CODE>[A-Za-z0-9@-]</CODE>
> +16 bit counter quadruple) using the alphabet <CODE>[A-Za-z0-9@-]</CODE>
Not good. The phrase is "112-bit quadruple" with an enclosed
parenthetical explanation. The original text is correct.
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Apache Software Foundation http://www.apache.org/
"Apache Server for Dummies" http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Apache Server Unleashed" http://ApacheUnleashed.Com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: apache-docs-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: apache-docs-help@apache.org