Difference between sa-learn --spam and spamassassin -rda

["Steven W. Orr" <st...@syslang.net>]

I have both spamcop

spamcop_from_address steveo@syslang.net
spamcop_to_address submit.whathehay@spam.spamcop.net

in my local.cf

and when I get spam coming through I always forward it to spamcop. I also 
pipe it through sa-learn --spam but my question is:

If I pipe it through sa -r -d  I don't ever get a report to confirm from 
spamcop. Am I doing something wrong or is my expectation out of kilter?

TIA

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net

Re: Difference between sa-learn --spam and spamassassin -rda

["Steven W. Orr" <st...@syslang.net>]

On Friday, Jun 10th 2005 at 11:49 -0400, quoth Theo Van Dinter:

=>On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>> If I pipe it through sa -r -d  I don't ever get a report to confirm from 
=>
=>FYI: there's no point in adding -d to the report line.  In fact, you're just
=>causing SA to do more work.  (report already removes the markup, but -d causes
=>the markup to be removed a second time)
=>
=>-- 
=>Randomly Generated Tagline:
=>?pu gnikcab yb naem uoy tahw siht sI
=>

Ok. But...

If I pipe it through sa -r   I don't ever get a report to confirm from
spamcop. Am I doing something wrong or is my expectation out of kilter?

I have both spamcop entries

spamcop_from_address steveo@syslang.net
spamcop_to_address submit.whathehay@spam.spamcop.net

in my local.cf

Is it supposed to be reported as if I had submitted using their interface?

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net

Re: Difference between sa-learn --spam and spamassassin -rda

[Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> If I pipe it through sa -r -d  I don't ever get a report to confirm from 

FYI: there's no point in adding -d to the report line.  In fact, you're just
causing SA to do more work.  (report already removes the markup, but -d causes
the markup to be removed a second time)

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
?pu gnikcab yb naem uoy tahw siht sI