You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@ws.apache.org by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> on 2002/03/15 00:28:30 UTC
Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
Hi rpc-list,
I know I should post this to the dev list but... well... here is a quick
result of a request to jakarta-general@jakarta.apache.org when looking
for a Base64 class. So I sort of understand the LPGL version is about to
be appropriately replaced, great !
(I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
making MinML part of Apache ??)
Paul
PS: shame on me, my cvs checkout of an hour ago proved me that the
base64 class is already an Apache one. Mmmmrfs. Sorry for this then. I
should really have been subscribed to the rpc-dev list...
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Waldhoff, Rodney" <rw...@us.britannica.com>
> Date: Vend mars 15, 2002 12:17:34 Europe/Brussels
> To: "'Jakarta General List'" <ge...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Base64 anywhere ?
> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <ge...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>> There is also one in Batik, JXTA, Catalina, Apache SOAP,
>> Apache Xerces, Axis, Commons, Talon and Freenet.
>
> Also Slide, Commons-HttpClient, etc. Moreover many of them have some
> direct
> cut-and-paste relationship.
>
> For what it's worth, the commons-codec package
> (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/codec/) is
> intended
> avoid having so many flavors or having to "grab" a Base64 implementation
> from an otherwise unrelated framework or application.
Re: Base64 anywhere ?
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
"John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Libbrecht" <pa...@activemath.org>
> To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
>
>
> [snip]
> > (I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
>> making MinML part of Apache ??)
>
> I have no plans to release MinML under the Apache licence. BSD seems to be
> OK for most people.
Definitely. The BSD license is also fully compatible with the Apache
license.
Re: Base64 anywhere ?
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
"John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Libbrecht" <pa...@activemath.org>
> To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
>
>
> [snip]
> > (I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
>> making MinML part of Apache ??)
>
> I have no plans to release MinML under the Apache licence. BSD seems to be
> OK for most people.
Definitely. The BSD license is also fully compatible with the Apache
license.
Re: Base64 anywhere ?
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
It surely is ok for most people, oh yes.
It's just that lately I've been spending times cleaning up third-party
dependencies and I found a huge lot of them !
Paul
On Vendredi, mars 15, 2002, at 12:44 , John Wilson wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Libbrecht" <pa...@activemath.org>
> To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
>
>
> [snip]
>> (I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
>> making MinML part of Apache ??)
>
> I have no plans to release MinML under the Apache licence. BSD seems to
> be
> OK for most people.
>
> John Wilson
> The Wilson Partnership
> http://www.wilson.co.uk
>
>
Re: Base64 anywhere ?
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
It surely is ok for most people, oh yes.
It's just that lately I've been spending times cleaning up third-party
dependencies and I found a huge lot of them !
Paul
On Vendredi, mars 15, 2002, at 12:44 , John Wilson wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Libbrecht" <pa...@activemath.org>
> To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
>
>
> [snip]
>> (I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
>> making MinML part of Apache ??)
>
> I have no plans to release MinML under the Apache licence. BSD seems to
> be
> OK for most people.
>
> John Wilson
> The Wilson Partnership
> http://www.wilson.co.uk
>
>
Re: Base64 anywhere ?
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <pa...@activemath.org>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 PM
Subject: Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
[snip]
> (I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
> making MinML part of Apache ??)
I have no plans to release MinML under the Apache licence. BSD seems to be
OK for most people.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
Re: Base64 anywhere ?
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Libbrecht" <pa...@activemath.org>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:28 PM
Subject: Fwd: Base64 anywhere ?
[snip]
> (I might be kidding but I love license uniformity, no thoughts towards
> making MinML part of Apache ??)
I have no plans to release MinML under the Apache licence. BSD seems to be
OK for most people.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk