You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by "Francisco Tolmasky (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/12 20:48:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (TIKA-3132) Many missing sub-class-of application/xml (or at least text/plain) for +xml types

Francisco Tolmasky created TIKA-3132:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Many missing sub-class-of application/xml (or at least text/plain) for +xml types
                 Key: TIKA-3132
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3132
             Project: Tika
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: tika-batch
    Affects Versions: 1.24.1
            Reporter: Francisco Tolmasky


I'm not sure if this is by design or not, but many +xml types in tika-mimetypes.xml seem to be missing the sub-class-of tag. At first I thought that maybe Tika was smart enough to infer that +xml types must be subclasses of application/xml, but then I noticed that not *every* xml type is missing this tag. For example, image/svg+xml *does* have the application/xml sub-class-of tag explicitly set. Others include rdf+xml, dif+xml, etc. Would there be any opposition to me creating a PR that adds sub-class-of to a bunch of these (for example, atom+xml)? Or am I missing something here?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)