You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Bruno Borges <br...@gmail.com> on 2007/05/03 22:06:32 UTC

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

I'd vote for 2.0, but what about waiting for that, after wicket leaves
apache incubator? Until, 1.4 is fine I think. :)

Cheers

PS: Wicket in Brazil... :)
http://blog.brunoborges.com.br/search/label/Wicket
-- 
Bruno Borges
Summa Technologies Inc.
www.summa-tech.com
(48) 8404-1300
(11) 3055-2060

On 4/29/07, Jonathan Locke <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> we listed the microsoft naming convention (Wicket 2007)
> but skipped right over sun's naming conventions!  what about
> "Apache Wicket SE 6u1" or "Apache Wicket W2SE 6.0 WDK"
>
> [X] Apache Wicket 2.0
>
> the requirement of JDK 1.5 is actually a major shift for
> users even if it doesn't break APIs.  i also think the
> constructor change branch will quickly be forgotten.
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >
> > There is a vote already in place for switching the development
> > branches around. Now it is time to name the release after 1.3 (and not
> > 1.3.1 :).
> >
> > Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by:
> > [ ] Apache Wicket 1.4
> > [ ] Apache Wicket 1.5 (after the JDK)
> > [ ] Apache Wicket 5 (similar, but more accurate)
> > [ ] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change)
> > [ ] Apache Wicket 2007
> > [ ] Apache Wicket r59332 (just use the damned revision number)
> >
> > Other proposals are permitted.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Name-the-release-after-1.3-tf3603749.html#a10245158
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>