You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> on 2013/07/16 22:52:16 UTC
[VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Applying a forcing function:
Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/.
Release notes are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
[] +1 Looks good
[] 0 - No opinion
[] -1 Don't release
Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
Thanks,
Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Working on this today. LDAP at ASF seems to be mucked up at the moment, so when it becomes available, I'll do the necessary copying, etc.
-Grant
On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> This passes. I will finish off the release either tonight or tomorrow AM.
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:06 AM, Jake Mannix <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me, I used the jars to run some LDA (on a couple hundred million
>> documents) on the work cluster (1.0.something small), and it worked fine.
>> Other clustering example (with reuters) also worked as expected.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:22 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me, recommender stuff worked fine in my tests
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/7/18 Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> +1 from me.
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Applying a forcing function:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> Release notes are at
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
>>>>>
>>>>> [] +1 Looks good
>>>>> [] 0 - No opinion
>>>>> [] -1 Don't release
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>>>
>>>>> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
>>>>> Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
>>> approval
>>>> -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
>>>> and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
>>>> vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
>>>> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
>>>> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
>>>> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Grant
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -jake
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
> http://www.lucidworks.com
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
http://www.lucidworks.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
This passes. I will finish off the release either tonight or tomorrow AM.
On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:06 AM, Jake Mannix <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me, I used the jars to run some LDA (on a couple hundred million
> documents) on the work cluster (1.0.something small), and it worked fine.
> Other clustering example (with reuters) also worked as expected.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
>>
>>
>> +1 from me, recommender stuff worked fine in my tests
>>
>>
>> 2013/7/18 Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Applying a forcing function:
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Release notes are at
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
>>>>
>>>> [] +1 Looks good
>>>> [] 0 - No opinion
>>>> [] -1 Don't release
>>>>
>>>> Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>>
>>>> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
>>>> Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
>> approval
>>> -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
>>> and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
>>> vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
>>> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
>>> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
>>> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Grant
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> -jake
--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
http://www.lucidworks.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Jake Mannix <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me, I used the jars to run some LDA (on a couple hundred million
documents) on the work cluster (1.0.something small), and it worked fine.
Other clustering example (with reuters) also worked as expected.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
>
>
> +1 from me, recommender stuff worked fine in my tests
>
>
> 2013/7/18 Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
>
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Applying a forcing function:
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
> > .
> > >
> > > Release notes are at
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
> > >
> > > [] +1 Looks good
> > > [] 0 - No opinion
> > > [] -1 Don't release
> > >
> > > Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> > >
> > > What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
> > > Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
> approval
> > -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> > and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> > vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
> > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Grant
> >
> >
> >
>
--
-jake
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Suneel Marthi <su...@yahoo.com>.
+1 from me.
________________________________
From: Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
+1 from me, recommender stuff worked fine in my tests
2013/7/18 Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
> +1 from me.
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Applying a forcing function:
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
> .
> >
> > Release notes are at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
> >
> > [] +1 Looks good
> > [] 0 - No opinion
> > [] -1 Don't release
> >
> > Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >
> > What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
> > Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
> -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Grant
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Sebastian Schelter <ss...@apache.org>.
+1 from me, recommender stuff worked fine in my tests
2013/7/18 Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>
> +1 from me.
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Applying a forcing function:
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
> .
> >
> > Release notes are at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
> >
> > [] +1 Looks good
> > [] 0 - No opinion
> > [] -1 Don't release
> >
> > Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >
> > What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
> > Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
> -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Grant
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1 from me.
On Jul 16, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> Applying a forcing function:
>
> Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/.
>
> Release notes are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
>
> [] +1 Looks good
> [] 0 - No opinion
> [] -1 Don't release
>
> Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
> Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I pointed a project that uses Mahout to this staging repo. The compile and
> package went properly and my IDE was able to download and attach sources
> correctly.
>
> I manually pulled down a few artifacts and noodled around in them and they
> seemed good.
>
> I didn't check signature yet.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Applying a forcing function:
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
> > .
> >
> > Release notes are at
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
> >
> > [] +1 Looks good
> > [] 0 - No opinion
> > [] -1 Don't release
> >
> > Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >
> > What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
> > Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
> > -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> > and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> > vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
> > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Grant
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.8
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
+1
I pointed a project that uses Mahout to this staging repo. The compile and
package went properly and my IDE was able to download and attach sources
correctly.
I manually pulled down a few artifacts and noodled around in them and they
seemed good.
I didn't check signature yet.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
> Applying a forcing function:
>
> Please vote on releasing the 0.8 artifacts at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-113/org/apache/mahout/
> .
>
> Release notes are at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/Release+0.8
>
> [] +1 Looks good
> [] 0 - No opinion
> [] -1 Don't release
>
> Vote criteria from https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?
> Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval
> -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> and there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> vetoed. Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed
> source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting
> executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the
> package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Grant