You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Jarek Cecho <ja...@apache.org> on 2012/12/11 06:54:17 UTC
Review Request: SQOOP-755 Sqoop2: Provide license file with license
information for all artifacts included in binary release
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for Sqoop.
Description
-------
I've provided license information for all jars that are included in our binary artifact. Everything seems fine up to jersey library that is using CDDL. Based on [1] this should be fine as it's clearly marked and we're only depending on binary artifact.
Links:
1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
This addresses bug SQOOP-755.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-755
Diffs
-----
LICENSE.txt d645695673349e3947e8e5ae42332d0ac3164cd7
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/diff/
Testing
-------
Thanks,
Jarek Cecho
Re: Review Request: SQOOP-755 Sqoop2: Provide license file with license
information for all artifacts included in binary release
Posted by Cheolsoo Park <ch...@cloudera.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/#review14401
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Cheolsoo Park
On Dec. 12, 2012, 10:40 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 12, 2012, 10:40 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Sqoop.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> I've provided license information for all jars that are included in our binary artifact. Everything seems fine up to jersey library that is using CDDL. Based on [1] this should be fine as it's clearly marked and we're only depending on binary artifact.
>
> Links:
> 1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>
>
> This addresses bug SQOOP-755.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-755
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> LICENSE.txt d645695673349e3947e8e5ae42332d0ac3164cd7
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jarek Cecho
>
>
Re: Review Request: SQOOP-755 Sqoop2: Provide license file with license
information for all artifacts included in binary release
Posted by Jarek Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Dec. 12, 2012, 10:40 p.m.)
Review request for Sqoop.
Changes
-------
Fixed the typo in common library, thank you Cheolsoo!
Description
-------
I've provided license information for all jars that are included in our binary artifact. Everything seems fine up to jersey library that is using CDDL. Based on [1] this should be fine as it's clearly marked and we're only depending on binary artifact.
Links:
1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
This addresses bug SQOOP-755.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-755
Diffs (updated)
-----
LICENSE.txt d645695673349e3947e8e5ae42332d0ac3164cd7
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/diff/
Testing
-------
Thanks,
Jarek Cecho
Re: Review Request: SQOOP-755 Sqoop2: Provide license file with license
information for all artifacts included in binary release
Posted by Cheolsoo Park <ch...@cloudera.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/#review14396
-----------------------------------------------------------
LICENSE.txt
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/#comment30621>
Typo: common -> commons
- Cheolsoo Park
On Dec. 11, 2012, 5:54 a.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 11, 2012, 5:54 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Sqoop.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> I've provided license information for all jars that are included in our binary artifact. Everything seems fine up to jersey library that is using CDDL. Based on [1] this should be fine as it's clearly marked and we're only depending on binary artifact.
>
> Links:
> 1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>
>
> This addresses bug SQOOP-755.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-755
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> LICENSE.txt d645695673349e3947e8e5ae42332d0ac3164cd7
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8461/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jarek Cecho
>
>