You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> on 2020/03/13 13:05:14 UTC
[VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Hi all,
I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
Best,
Wei
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
[2] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
The voting time for FLIP-106 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
There were 5 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
- Jincheng (binding)
- Hequn (binding)
- Dian (binding)
- Benchao (non-binding)
- Dan (non-binding)
There were no disapproving votes.
Thus, FLIP-106 has been accepted.
Thanks everyone for joining the discussion and giving feedback!
Best,
Wei
> 在 2020年3月19日，09:53，Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Thanks everyone for the votes!
> I’ll summarize the voting result in a separate email.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
>> 在 2020年3月18日，15:37，zoudan <zo...@163.com> 写道：
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Dan Zou
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com>.
Thanks everyone for the votes!
I’ll summarize the voting result in a separate email.
Best,
Wei
> 在 2020年3月18日，15:37，zoudan <zo...@163.com> 写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Dan Zou
>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by zoudan <zo...@163.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Dan Zou
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Dian Fu <di...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:56 PM Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Hequn
>
> > On Mar 17, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Benchao Li <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > BTW it's in the same thread in my gmail too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月17日周二 上午11:47写道：
> >
> >> Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again...
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Kurt
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Kurt,
> >>>
> >>> This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is
> >>> combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the
> >> mail
> >>> client.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Wei
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
> >>> <
> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>> 在 2020年3月17日，10:57，Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Kurt
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <
> >> sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Jincheng
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed
> and
> >>>>>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
> >>>>>> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough
> >> votes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Wei
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
> >>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Benchao Li
> > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> > Tel:+86-15650713730
> > Email: libenchao@gmail.com; libenchao@pku.edu.cn
>
>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Hequn Cheng <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Best,
Hequn
> On Mar 17, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Benchao Li <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> BTW it's in the same thread in my gmail too.
>
>
>
> Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月17日周二 上午11:47写道：
>
>> Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again...
>>
>> Best,
>> Kurt
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kurt,
>>>
>>> This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is
>>> combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the
>> mail
>>> client.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Wei
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
>>> <
>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>> 在 2020年3月17日，10:57，Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 写道：
>>>>
>>>> Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Kurt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <
>> sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Jincheng
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and
>>>>>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
>>>>>> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough
>> votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Wei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Benchao Li
> School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
> Tel:+86-15650713730
> Email: libenchao@gmail.com; libenchao@pku.edu.cn
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Benchao Li <li...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
BTW it's in the same thread in my gmail too.
Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月17日周二 上午11:47写道：
> Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again...
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kurt,
> >
> > This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is
> > combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the
> mail
> > client.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
> > <
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
> > >
> >
> > > 在 2020年3月17日，10:57，Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 写道：
> > >
> > > Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <
> sunjincheng121@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Jincheng
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and
> > >>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
> > >>> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough
> votes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Wei
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
> > >>> [2]
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
--
Benchao Li
School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University
Tel:+86-15650713730
Email: libenchao@gmail.com; libenchao@pku.edu.cn
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com>.
Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again...
Best,
Kurt
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is
> combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the mail
> client.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> [1]
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
> <
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html
> >
>
> > 在 2020年3月17日，10:57，Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kurt
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Jincheng
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and
> >>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
> >>> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Wei
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com>.
Hi Kurt,
This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the mail client.
Best,
Wei
[1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html <http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html>
> 在 2020年3月17日，10:57，Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread.
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Best,
>> Jincheng
>>
>>
>>
>> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and
>>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
>>> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Wei
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
>>> [2]
>>>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by Kurt Young <yk...@gmail.com>.
Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread.
Best,
Kurt
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
>
>
> Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and
> > reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
> > 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
> > [2]
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL
Posted by jincheng sun <su...@gmail.com>.
+1
Best,
Jincheng
Wei Zhong <we...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and
> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by
> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL
> [2]
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html
>
>