[jira] [Commented] (JCR-3765) JCR Event Info should contain NodeType

["Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13958619#comment-13958619 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on JCR-3765:
-------------------------------------

"An implication of this is however that we also need to adapt the TCK as this will cause org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.GetInfoTest to fail, which expects the info map to be generally empty. "

...or mark the test case as failing.

The interesting question is whether adding new stuff to the map actually might break code...

> JCR Event Info should contain NodeType
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-3765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3765
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This issue is about back porting the features introduced in Oak with OAK-1661 and OAK-1669:
> Code developped for Jackrabbit's Observation often struggle with processing events for deleted Nodes. Processing like for aggregation may depend on the type of the deleted Node. The solution to take a Nodetype filter could be prevented or some reasons.
> Adding the node-type to the Event's Info object would help in this cases. OAK-1661 added node type information for NODE_ADDED and NODE_REMOVED events. We should consider adding this for all event types however. Even property events would contain node type of the node the property is associated with (parent).
> An implication of this is however that we also need to adapt the TCK as this will cause org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.GetInfoTest to fail, which expects the info map to be generally empty.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)