Re: Sanity checking in Solr

[Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>]

Yeah, this would be totally cool. Personally, if it fits into the
debug component
I'd advocate adding it in automatically if debug=all/true, assuming it wasn't
all that expensive at run time.


On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Toke Eskildsen <te...@statsbiblioteket.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 13:30 +0100, Upayavira wrote:
>> Could it be added to the debug component? That seems like a natural
>> place for it. It could, as you say, look for standard things that
>> might make a query perform badly, and report them in a new <sanity>
>> element, or such.
>
> Agreed. I'll take a closer look on how the debug mechanism ties into
> Solr. If sanity checking fits well, I'll try and make a proof of concept
> and a JIRA.
>
> - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org