[PROPOSAL] Two changes for to our BOM

[Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>]

Hi!

while we've been working with the Hadoop community
on stabilizing Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha two things have happened:
   1. Hue 2.3 is about to be released
   2. Giraph 1.0 is about to be released

I'd like to propose these as changes to our BOM. I know
this is late in the game, but both versions feel way better
compared to the ones we're targeting.

Chime in if you happen to disagree, otherwise: BIGTOP-832
BIGTOP-926

Thanks,
Roman.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two changes for to our BOM

[Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>]

+1

On 04/17/2013 11:07 AM, Mark Grover wrote:
> +1, they seem reasonable and fairly self-contained.
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Arun Singla <ar...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> +0 overall
>>
>> +1, considering the bigtop goal is to be a cutting edge integration of
>> hadoop ecosystem components so why not include a latest release of
>> components.
>> +0, considering another equally important goal that bigtop should do
>> releases in a timely manner instead of continuous change to goal posts.
>> This suggested change isn't anticipated to destabilize current state of 0.6
>> - so this should be fine.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Sean Mackrory <mackrorysd@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 - those both seem like good changes
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> while we've been working with the Hadoop community
>>>> on stabilizing Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha two things have happened:
>>>>     1. Hue 2.3 is about to be released
>>>>     2. Giraph 1.0 is about to be released
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose these as changes to our BOM. I know
>>>> this is late in the game, but both versions feel way better
>>>> compared to the ones we're targeting.
>>>>
>>>> Chime in if you happen to disagree, otherwise: BIGTOP-832
>>>> BIGTOP-926
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roman.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two changes for to our BOM

[Mark Grover <gr...@gmail.com>]

+1, they seem reasonable and fairly self-contained.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Arun Singla <ar...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> +0 overall
>
> +1, considering the bigtop goal is to be a cutting edge integration of
> hadoop ecosystem components so why not include a latest release of
> components.
> +0, considering another equally important goal that bigtop should do
> releases in a timely manner instead of continuous change to goal posts.
> This suggested change isn't anticipated to destabilize current state of 0.6
> - so this should be fine.
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Sean Mackrory <mackrorysd@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > +1 - those both seem like good changes
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > while we've been working with the Hadoop community
> > > on stabilizing Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha two things have happened:
> > >    1. Hue 2.3 is about to be released
> > >    2. Giraph 1.0 is about to be released
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose these as changes to our BOM. I know
> > > this is late in the game, but both versions feel way better
> > > compared to the ones we're targeting.
> > >
> > > Chime in if you happen to disagree, otherwise: BIGTOP-832
> > > BIGTOP-926
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.
> > >
> >
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two changes for to our BOM

[Arun Singla <ar...@cloudera.com>]

+0 overall

+1, considering the bigtop goal is to be a cutting edge integration of
hadoop ecosystem components so why not include a latest release of
components.
+0, considering another equally important goal that bigtop should do
releases in a timely manner instead of continuous change to goal posts.
This suggested change isn't anticipated to destabilize current state of 0.6
- so this should be fine.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com>wrote:

> +1 - those both seem like good changes
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > while we've been working with the Hadoop community
> > on stabilizing Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha two things have happened:
> >    1. Hue 2.3 is about to be released
> >    2. Giraph 1.0 is about to be released
> >
> > I'd like to propose these as changes to our BOM. I know
> > this is late in the game, but both versions feel way better
> > compared to the ones we're targeting.
> >
> > Chime in if you happen to disagree, otherwise: BIGTOP-832
> > BIGTOP-926
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Two changes for to our BOM

[Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com>]

+1 - those both seem like good changes


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> while we've been working with the Hadoop community
> on stabilizing Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha two things have happened:
>    1. Hue 2.3 is about to be released
>    2. Giraph 1.0 is about to be released
>
> I'd like to propose these as changes to our BOM. I know
> this is late in the game, but both versions feel way better
> compared to the ones we're targeting.
>
> Chime in if you happen to disagree, otherwise: BIGTOP-832
> BIGTOP-926
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>