You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Michael Yoder (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2007/08/22 23:46:31 UTC
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1371) C++ SDO spec compliance/portability:
DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael Yoder updated TUSCANY-1371:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: TUSCANY-1371.txt
This patch updates the DataObject::getProperty methods to the 2.1 spec API.
> C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1371
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ SDO, C++ Specification
> Affects Versions: Cpp-M3
> Environment: API issue - all platforms
> Reporter: Michael Yoder
> Fix For: Cpp-Next
>
> Attachments: TUSCANY-1371.txt
>
>
> The Tuscany C++ SDO specification interface introduces off-spec member function overloads for "getProperty". The SDO 2.1 spec introduces the member function: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop), whicfh should replace these functions.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Yoder
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:35 PM
> To: 'tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org'
> Subject: C++ SDO spec compliance/portability: DataObject::getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)
> Hi,
> In the DataObject interface, these member functions are present which are not in the C++ 2.1 specification:
> virtual const Property& getProperty(unsigned int index) = 0;
> virtual const Property& getProperty(const char* prop) = 0;
> virtual const Property& getProperty(const SDOString& prop) = 0;
> Since the 2.1 spec now has "getInstanceProperty(const std::string& prop)", would it be a good idea to file a Jira/patch to replace these member functions with it in the specification interface?
> Thanks,
> Michael Yoder
> Rogue Wave Software - yoder@roguewave.com Software Developer - HydraSDO
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org