You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to announce@apache.org by Hyrum Wright <hw...@apache.org> on 2012/02/13 15:49:25 UTC
Apache Subversion 1.7.3 Released
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.3. This
release is the best available release of Subversion, and we encourage
all users to upgrade as soon as practical. Subversion 1.7.3 fixes a
number of crashes and improves error handling in several cases (please
see CHANGES for details).
This release also includes a correctness for for mod_dav_svn
responses. Unfortunately, this same fix highlights several bugs
already existant in svnrdump when it is run over ra_serf. For this
reason, we continue to recommend that users use ra_neon--the default
for the 1.7.x series--when running svnrdump.
To download the latest release of Subversion, please choose the mirror
closest to you by visiting:
http://subversion.apache.org/download/#recommended-release
The SHA1 checksums are:
eebeb77f1a8d352adcd8fe684b52e66be9fdcbce subversion-1.7.3.zip
624d4070361c0e8d7cf4f5c667629e72459b122d subversion-1.7.3.tar.bz2
0b97f7a3ebef31f3fc96f73eda2974eedee7aaf7 subversion-1.7.3.tar.gz
PGP Signatures are available at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/subversion/subversion-1.7.3.tar.bz2.asc
http://www.apache.org/dist/subversion/subversion-1.7.3.tar.gz.asc
http://www.apache.org/dist/subversion/subversion-1.7.3.zip.asc
For this release, the following people have provided PGP signatures:
C. Michael Pilato [1024D/1706FD6E] with fingerprint:
20BF 14DC F02F 2730 7EA4 C7BB A241 06A9 1706 FD6E
Paul T. Burba [1024D/53FCDC55] with fingerprint:
E630 CF54 792C F913 B13C 32C5 D916 8930 53FC DC55
Bert Huijben [1024D/9821F7B2] with fingerprint:
2017 F51A 2572 0E78 8827 5329 FCFD 6305 9821 F7B2
Hyrum K. Wright [1024D/4E24517C] with fingerprint:
3324 80DA 0F8C A37D AEE6 D084 0B03 AE6E 4E24 517C
Philip Martin [2048R/ED1A599C] with fingerprint:
A844 790F B574 3606 EE95 9207 76D7 88E1 ED1A 599C
Stefan Sperling [1024D/F59D25F0] with fingerprint:
B1CF 1060 A1E9 34D1 9E86 D6D6 E5D3 0273 F59D 25F0
Mark Phippard [1024D/035A96A9] with fingerprint:
D315 89DB E1C1 E9BA D218 39FD 265D F8A0 035A 96A9
Release notes for the 1.7.x release series may be found at:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html
You can find the list of changes between 1.7.3 and earlier versions at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/tags/1.7.3/CHANGES
Questions, comments, and bug reports to users@subversion.apache.org.
Thanks,
- The Subversion Team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: announce-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: announce-help@apache.org
Re: Apache Subversion 1.7.3 Released
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:23:42PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Cool. I'm looking at RPM bundling for it: I note the addition of the
> "mod_dontdothat" module, which is making me laugh a bit at the name.
> Does anyone have a good sample dontdothat config file I can add to the
> RPM bundle?
See bottom of https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=subversion.README.SuSE&package=subversion&project=devel%3Atools%3Ascm%3Asvn&rev=6adc775d1afe4f92ed5922970918c16d
> I'm also uncertain of whether to bundle the dontrformat tools with the
> mod_dav_svn package, on which it is dependent and which it it is used
> for. Does anyone have an opinion as to whether it should be separate?
I would bundle it with mod_dav_svn. It is quite Subversion-specific.
It could be used independently of Subversion but I don't think many
people do that.
Re: Apache Subversion 1.7.3 Released
Posted by Nico Kadel-Garcia <nk...@gmail.com>.
Cool. I'm looking at RPM bundling for it: I note the addition of the
"mod_dontdothat" module, which is making me laugh a bit at the name.
Does anyone have a good sample dontdothat config file I can add to the
RPM bundle?
I'm also uncertain of whether to bundle the dontrformat tools with the
mod_dav_svn package, on which it is dependent and which it it is used
for. Does anyone have an opinion as to whether it should be separate?