You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> on 2006/10/31 09:34:01 UTC

SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch

Hi Ignacio,

I've applied SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch from  
Tuscany-648. One thing I noticed is we are using Stacks for routing.  
Can we get rid of that synchronization overhead by using a LinkedList  
since access probably doesn't need to be thread-safe or  
ConcurrentLinkedList if thread-safety is required?

Jim 
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org

Re: SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch

Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.

Thanks, just applied and committed it (hopefully your commit rights  
will come through soon).

Jim

On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> Ok, done. I posted the patch in TUSCANY-642 (Simpl...6.patch)
>
>
> On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ignacio,
>>
>> I've applied SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch from
>> Tuscany-648. One thing I noticed is we are using Stacks for routing.
>> Can we get rid of that synchronization overhead by using a LinkedList
>> since access probably doesn't need to be thread-safe or
>> ConcurrentLinkedList if thread-safety is required?
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org

Re: SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch

Posted by Ignacio Silva-Lepe <is...@gmail.com>.

Hi Jim,

Ok, done. I posted the patch in TUSCANY-642 (Simpl...6.patch)


On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ignacio,
>
> I've applied SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch from
> Tuscany-648. One thing I noticed is we are using Stacks for routing.
> Can we get rid of that synchronization overhead by using a LinkedList
> since access probably doesn't need to be thread-safe or
> ConcurrentLinkedList if thread-safety is required?
>
> Jim
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>