You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> on 2013/02/11 17:10:29 UTC
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Nobody?
No opinion?
2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> Hello guys,
>
> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot
> of new features.
>
> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then
> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0 after.
>
> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to start the
> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
about the bts: depend the size/how you want to integrate it but basically
what prevents you to use it in openejb? i think a service (see how is done
ejbdservice maybe) is easy to do and can be hosted with bts (which make
probably more sense ATM)
wdyt?
about a logo: we did a contest but since the vote is not started you have
some time to propose one more i think ;)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/2/11 Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com>
> what do you think about ,
> BTS ( Binary Transfer Sockets ) , it includes video and multimedia
> communication faster then Adobe
>
> Can we integrate it into openejb for p2p support ?
>
> Btw , do you need logo ?
>
>
>
> On 11 Şub 2013, at 19:08, Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com> wrote:
>
> > Another thing , We have made java p2p library.
> > We will make it opensource and its so fast with low bandwidth
> communication.
> >
> > BTS ( Binary Transfer Sockets ) , it includes video and multimedia
> communication faster then Adobe.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:14, Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com> wrote:
> >
> >> It will be good to see openejb would have many integrated jaas futures
> like ;
> >> ActiveMQ + OpenEJB shared jaas authentication ( maybe opensso )
> >> I will try it now.
> >> JavaCard integration to JAAS
> >>
> >> OpenEJB has only 2 jaas modules thats so weak.
> >> Another thing is , for android and ios it would be good to add low
> bandwidth communicator.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Nobody?
> >>> No opinion?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding
> a lot
> >>>> of new features.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing,
> then
> >>>> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0
> after.
> >>>>
> >>>> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to
> start the
> >>>> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Posted by Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com>.
what do you think about ,
BTS ( Binary Transfer Sockets ) , it includes video and multimedia communication faster then Adobe
Can we integrate it into openejb for p2p support ?
Btw , do you need logo ?
On 11 Şub 2013, at 19:08, Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com> wrote:
> Another thing , We have made java p2p library.
> We will make it opensource and its so fast with low bandwidth communication.
>
> BTS ( Binary Transfer Sockets ) , it includes video and multimedia communication faster then Adobe.
>
>
>
>
> On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:14, Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com> wrote:
>
>> It will be good to see openejb would have many integrated jaas futures like ;
>> ActiveMQ + OpenEJB shared jaas authentication ( maybe opensso )
>> I will try it now.
>> JavaCard integration to JAAS
>>
>> OpenEJB has only 2 jaas modules thats so weak.
>> Another thing is , for android and ios it would be good to add low bandwidth communicator.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Nobody?
>>> No opinion?
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>
>>>> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot
>>>> of new features.
>>>>
>>>> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then
>>>> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0 after.
>>>>
>>>> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to start the
>>>> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Posted by Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com>.
Another thing , We have made java p2p library.
We will make it opensource and its so fast with low bandwidth communication.
BTS ( Binary Transfer Sockets ) , it includes video and multimedia communication faster then Adobe.
On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:14, Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com> wrote:
> It will be good to see openejb would have many integrated jaas futures like ;
> ActiveMQ + OpenEJB shared jaas authentication ( maybe opensso )
> I will try it now.
> JavaCard integration to JAAS
>
> OpenEJB has only 2 jaas modules thats so weak.
> Another thing is , for android and ios it would be good to add low bandwidth communicator.
>
>
>
> On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nobody?
>> No opinion?
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot
>>> of new features.
>>>
>>> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then
>>> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0 after.
>>>
>>> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to start the
>>> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sule,
Those are really great ideas and we are all open to integrate them.
Do you think you could fill a Jira and propose at least a first version?
Would be valuable and would also help us adding such features.
Jean-Louis
2013/2/11 Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com>
> It will be good to see openejb would have many integrated jaas futures
> like ;
> ActiveMQ + OpenEJB shared jaas authentication ( maybe opensso )
> I will try it now.
> JavaCard integration to JAAS
>
> OpenEJB has only 2 jaas modules thats so weak.
> Another thing is , for android and ios it would be good to add low
> bandwidth communicator.
>
>
>
> On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Nobody?
> > No opinion?
> >
> >
> > 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hello guys,
> >>
> >> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a
> lot
> >> of new features.
> >>
> >> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then
> >> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0
> after.
> >>
> >> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to start
> the
> >> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
>
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Posted by Sule BASOL <ka...@icloud.com>.
It will be good to see openejb would have many integrated jaas futures like ;
ActiveMQ + OpenEJB shared jaas authentication ( maybe opensso )
I will try it now.
JavaCard integration to JAAS
OpenEJB has only 2 jaas modules thats so weak.
Another thing is , for android and ios it would be good to add low bandwidth communicator.
On 11 Şub 2013, at 18:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nobody?
> No opinion?
>
>
> 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot
>> of new features.
>>
>> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then
>> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0 after.
>>
>> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to start the
>> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
Re: [Discuss] Time to release 1.5.2
Posted by Thiago Veronezi <th...@veronezi.org>.
I think 1.5.2 would be nice.
Andy and Romain are on fire as usual... fixing bugs like crazy! Thanks guys!
[]s,
Thiago.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
<je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nobody?
> No opinion?
>
>
> 2013/1/31 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> The trunk (1.6.0 from our latest discussions) is currently embedding a lot
>> of new features.
>>
>> I think the gap between the 1.5.2 (maintenance release) is growing, then
>> IMO we should start the release 1.5.2 in order to focus on the 1.6.0 after.
>>
>> End users are waiting the maintenance release so I would like to start the
>> process and release the maintenance release 1.5.2.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis