Re: [Fwd: Re: [x86_64] problem running DRLVM]

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>]

Gregory Shimansky wrote:
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> I think I said I was going to look at it...
>>
>> An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
>> have someone else race and beat them to it...
>>
>> I'm not mad, but wanted to let you know.
> 
> I considered these to be two separate problems. One is that launcher crashes 
> in case of no arguments, another is when drlvm throws UnsatisfiedLinkError 
> which means that it is actually running, in which case newPathToAdd should be 
> initialized in the launcher (but is probably initialized in a wrong way).

Ah

> 
> I did not try to fix the second problem, I don't even know how to reproduce it 
> because for me drlvm doesn't give these problems and I don't have gump 
> installed to try to see what's happening when it is running in gump 
> environment.
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [x86_64] problem running DRLVM
>> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:16:10 +0300
>> From: Gregory Shimansky <	>
>> Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> References: <45...@apache.org> <ej...@sea.gmane.org>
>> <45...@apache.org> <45...@pobox.com>
>>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>>> Gregory Shimansky wrote:
>>>>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>>>>> I've tried to run the VM launcher and I get:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [stefano@harmony-em64t]
>>>>>> ~/src/harmony/drlvm/build/lnx_em64t_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin $ ./java
>>>>>> Harmony Java launcher
>>>>>> Apache Harmony Launcher : (c) Copyright 1991, 2006 The Apache Software
>>>>>> Foundation or its licensors, as applicable.
>>>>>> java [-vm:vmdll -vmdir:dir -D... [-X...]] [args]
>>>>>> *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x00007fffffe8aff0 ***
>>>>>> Aborted
>>>>>>
>>>>>> any idea?
>>>>> I've reproduced the crash. It is not exactly drlvm fault. It looks like
>>>>> harmony launcher crashes when it is ran without arguments. If you run
>>>>> it with some arguments it should work, at least it does work for me.
>>>> yeah, it works. <scratch-head/>
>>>>
>>>> you mean I'm the first one to run the launcher without parameters...
>>>> bizarre.
>>> On 64-bit? :)  Probably.
>> I fixed the crash at 475483. It happened because of an uninitialized
>> variable which happened to be non-NULL on x86_64.
>