You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com> on 2003/06/25 00:55:57 UTC

[VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes

Team,

While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input
API--I'd like to take advantage now of the relative
freeze in the codebase to move the StructureHandler
and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to the
fo and area packages respectively (similar to what
we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler).   

It primarily involves moving two files and updating
the headers of several others.  I've already submitted
a patch for this
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20397)
but it has fallen out of date; this time I will make
the change again and commit it to CVS.  I should be
able to get it done this weekend (sorry I can't do it
earlier.)

Here's my +1 on this.

Thanks,
Glen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: (Jeremias, Keiron) Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes

Posted by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com>.
Good--that's where it will go then (barring an
onslaught of -1's between now and this weekend)

BTW, I believe my original rationale for placing in
the Area package was by looking at the imports in
LayoutHandler--it seemed to be very heavily dependent
on the particular implementation of the Area Tree
being used.  I wasn't focusing on its
function/purpose.

Glen


--- Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch> wrote:
> Sorry for not being clear. I also meant the
> layoutmanager package.
> 
> On 26.06.2003 00:37:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
> > Should LayoutHandler go into the 
> > Layout (Jeremias) package or LayoutManager package
> > (Keiron)?  (Personally, I don't care--99% for me
> is
> > getting them out of apps.)
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email:
> fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: (Jeremias, Keiron) Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
Sorry for not being clear. I also meant the layoutmanager package.

On 26.06.2003 00:37:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
> Should LayoutHandler go into the 
> Layout (Jeremias) package or LayoutManager package
> (Keiron)?  (Personally, I don't care--99% for me is
> getting them out of apps.)


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


(Jeremias, Keiron) Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes

Posted by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com>.
Should LayoutHandler go into the 
Layout (Jeremias) package or LayoutManager package
(Keiron)?  (Personally, I don't care--99% for me is
getting them out of apps.)

Glen

--- Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch> wrote:
> +1 for moving them out, but as Keiron suggested I'd
> also prefer
> LayoutHandler in the layout package.
> 
> On 25.06.2003 00:55:57 Glen Mazza wrote:
> > While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input
> > API--I'd like to take advantage now of the
> relative
> > freeze in the codebase to move the
> StructureHandler
> > and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to
> the
> > fo and area packages respectively (similar to what
> > we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler).   
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email:
> fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] Move StructureHandler and LayoutHandler classes

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
+1 for moving them out, but as Keiron suggested I'd also prefer
LayoutHandler in the layout package.

On 25.06.2003 00:55:57 Glen Mazza wrote:
> While Victor and Jeremias are discussing an input
> API--I'd like to take advantage now of the relative
> freeze in the codebase to move the StructureHandler
> and LayoutHandler classes from the apps package to the
> fo and area packages respectively (similar to what
> we're doing with MIF/RTFHandler).   


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org