You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net> on 2007/12/01 01:29:16 UTC
Re: Acessing a WS with CXF by using a DynamicClient...
Am Donnerstag, den 29.11.2007, 14:46 -0800 schrieb Alexandre Gazola:
> Hello guys,
>
> I´m starting to develop with webservices... I would like to start with
> a simple call to a WS, given that I have the WSDL url. To relieve me
> from generating service interfaces, I´m trying to use a DynamicClient
> (as shown in http://xfire.codehaus.org/Dynamic+Client ).
Really? If you already have the WSDL, code generation is *much* easier
(and more accurate) than Dynamic Clients IMO. Here are Ant[1] and
Maven[2] based options for you.
HTH,
Glen
[1] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20070929
[2] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071129
Re: Acessing a WS with CXF by using a DynamicClient...
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net>.
Well, looking at the Dynamic Client you would appear to be losing your
compile-time checks at the least. But it was the premise for which he
was trying to use DynamicClient to begin with ("To relieve me from
generating service interfaces") that I was questioning. I got the
impression that the user had not much experience with wsdl2java, and as
a result, was overestimating the tool's difficulty.
Glen
Am Samstag, den 01.12.2007, 11:23 +0800 schrieb tog:
> Btw, conceptually it is the same: one is embedded in the other. Am I wrong ?
>
> On Dec 1, 2007 8:29 AM, Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 29.11.2007, 14:46 -0800 schrieb Alexandre Gazola:
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > I´m starting to develop with webservices... I would like to start with
> > > a simple call to a WS, given that I have the WSDL url. To relieve me
> > > from generating service interfaces, I´m trying to use a DynamicClient
> > > (as shown in http://xfire.codehaus.org/Dynamic+Client ).
> >
> > Really? If you already have the WSDL, code generation is *much* easier
> > (and more accurate) than Dynamic Clients IMO. Here are Ant[1] and
> > Maven[2] based options for you.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Glen
> >
> > [1] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20070929
> > [2] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071129
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: Acessing a WS with CXF by using a DynamicClient...
Posted by tog <gu...@gmail.com>.
Btw, conceptually it is the same: one is embedded in the other. Am I wrong ?
On Dec 1, 2007 8:29 AM, Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.11.2007, 14:46 -0800 schrieb Alexandre Gazola:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > I´m starting to develop with webservices... I would like to start with
> > a simple call to a WS, given that I have the WSDL url. To relieve me
> > from generating service interfaces, I´m trying to use a DynamicClient
> > (as shown in http://xfire.codehaus.org/Dynamic+Client ).
>
> Really? If you already have the WSDL, code generation is *much* easier
> (and more accurate) than Dynamic Clients IMO. Here are Ant[1] and
> Maven[2] based options for you.
>
> HTH,
> Glen
>
> [1] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20070929
> [2] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071129
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Guillaume
http://cheztog.blogspot.com