You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by ba...@apache.org on 2022/09/20 15:31:54 UTC

[www-site] branch main updated: Adding FAQ on modern javadoc per LEGAL-529

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

bayard pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/www-site.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
     new 4bb801be Adding FAQ on modern javadoc per LEGAL-529
4bb801be is described below

commit 4bb801be871684ad1436fa9f9b13a18f583f4883
Author: hen <de...@flamefew.com>
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 20 08:31:49 2022 -0700

    Adding FAQ on modern javadoc per LEGAL-529
---
 content/legal/resolved.md | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/content/legal/resolved.md b/content/legal/resolved.md
index a721c35e..4f5ee7d9 100644
--- a/content/legal/resolved.md
+++ b/content/legal/resolved.md
@@ -254,6 +254,10 @@ Of course Gems written under other licenses (such as MIT) may also be OK, depend
 
 Also note that the Ruby license is listed on the 'Category B' Weak Copyleft list above for binary usage (for example JRuby). 
 
+### From Java 9 onwards, Javadoc can include search functionallity that includes JavaScript under other open source licenses. Can Apache projects include this javadoc?
+
+From Java 9 onwards, Javadoc can include JavaScript under MIT, MIT OR GPL-3.0, or GPL-2.0 WITH ClasspathException-2.0. Apache binary releases (including Maven javadoc jars) and Apache websites may include this for their javadoc. It must not be included in source releases.
+
 
 ## Category X: What can we NOT include in an ASF Project?  {#category-x}
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org