You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by "David Mollitor (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/06/10 15:52:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HIVE-25235) Remove ThreadPoolExecutorWithOomHook
David Mollitor created HIVE-25235:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Remove ThreadPoolExecutorWithOomHook
Key: HIVE-25235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-25235
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: HiveServer2
Reporter: David Mollitor
Assignee: David Mollitor
While I was looking at [HIVE-24846] to better perform OOM logging and I just realized that this is not a good way to handle OOM.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1692230/is-it-possible-to-catch-out-of-memory-exception-in-java
bq. there's likely no easy way for you to recover from it if you do catch it
If we want to handle OOM, it's best to do it from outside. It's be to do it with the JVM facilities:
{{-XX:+ExitOnOutOfMemoryError}}
{{-XX:OnOutOfMemoryError}}
It seems odd that the OOM handler attempts to load a handler and then do more work when clearly the server is hosed at this point and just requesting to do more work will further add to memory pressure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)