You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Joe Polk <li...@javelinux.com> on 2005/03/21 15:40:54 UTC
Porn Spam
I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He is
setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but nothing
seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there a
good list of known spamming porn domains we could plug into hosts.deny or
something?
--
<<JAV>>
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>.
On Monday, March 21, 2005, 6:40:54 AM, Joe Polk wrote:
> I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He is
> setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but nothing
> seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
> coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there a
> good list of known spamming porn domains we could plug into hosts.deny or
> something?
Try SURBLs:
http://www.surbl.org/
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.
Hi!
> Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for overwrite?
You should follow the docs, there is much mentioned there. Like upgrading
your bayes databases. If you use those...
>> You dont happen to have the SURBL plugin installed i guess?
>> Would be wise to upgrade to SA 3.x or install the plugin for SURBL.
>>
>> See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/
>>
>> I am positive it will block most of the crap that you now see
>> passing the filters.
If you dont want or dont have the time to do it now, then at least install
the plugin mentioned above. Works well also.
Bye,
Raymond.
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by qqqq <qq...@usermail.com>.
IMHO, 3.x is by far the best and most efficient release to date.
Just follow the doc. It's very easy.
QQQQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Polk" <li...@javelinux.com>
To: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <ra...@prolocation.net>
Cc: <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: Porn Spam
| Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for
overwrite?
|
| --
| <<JAV>>
|
|
| ---------- Original Message -----------
| From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>
| To: Joe Polk <li...@javelinux.com>
| Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
| Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:41:28 +0100 (CET)
| Subject: Re: Porn Spam
|
| > Hi!
| >
| > > He's on 2.64 currently.
| >
| > >> You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
| > >> thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using
| > >> several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for
| > >> URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to
| > >> write special rules.
| >
| > You dont happen to have the SURBL plugin installed i guess?
| > Would be wise to upgrade to SA 3.x or install the plugin for SURBL.
| >
| > See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/
| >
| > I am positive it will block most of the crap that you now see
| > passing the filters.
| >
| > Bye,
| > Raymond.
| ------- End of Original Message -------
|
|
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by Joe Polk <li...@javelinux.com>.
Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for overwrite?
--
<<JAV>>
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>
To: Joe Polk <li...@javelinux.com>
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Porn Spam
> Hi!
>
> > He's on 2.64 currently.
>
> >> You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
> >> thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using
> >> several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for
> >> URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to
> >> write special rules.
>
> You dont happen to have the SURBL plugin installed i guess?
> Would be wise to upgrade to SA 3.x or install the plugin for SURBL.
>
> See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/
>
> I am positive it will block most of the crap that you now see
> passing the filters.
>
> Bye,
> Raymond.
------- End of Original Message -------
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.
Hi!
> He's on 2.64 currently.
>> You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
>> thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using
>> several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for
>> URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to
>> write special rules.
You dont happen to have the SURBL plugin installed i guess?
Would be wise to upgrade to SA 3.x or install the plugin for SURBL.
See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/spamcopuri/
I am positive it will block most of the crap that you now see passing the
filters.
Bye,
Raymond.
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by Joe Polk <li...@javelinux.com>.
He's on 2.64 currently.
--
<<JAV>>
---------- Original Message -----------
From: gallen@netrox.net
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:49:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Porn Spam
> You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
> thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using
> several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for
> URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to
> write special rules.
>
> > I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He
> > is
> > setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but
> > nothing
> > seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
> > coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there a
> > good list of known spamming porn domains we could plug into hosts.deny or
> > something?
> >
> > --
> > <<JAV>>
> >
------- End of Original Message -------
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by ga...@netrox.net.
You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best thing is
to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using several URL black
lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for URLs in spam. This will
likely stop your problem without having to write special rules.
> I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He
> is
> setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but
> nothing
> seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
> coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there a
> good list of known spamming porn domains we could plug into hosts.deny or
> something?
>
> --
> <<JAV>>
>
Re: Porn Spam
Posted by qqqq <qq...@usermail.com>.
Jon,
Can you post the rule for this? I would like to see an example.
TIA,
QQQQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon McGreevy" <mc...@waterloo.k12.ia.us>
To: "'Joe Polk'" <li...@javelinux.com>; <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: Porn Spam
| I made a few custom rules for SA
|
| I did a rawbody test for /jpg/i
| Also another rawbody for /gif/i
|
| And then gave these two point values just above the value of spam like I
| have mine set at 8 and gave each of these a 30. The emails that I have
been
| getting in were just a weblink and some text. My system is not catching
| most of the messages like that coming in and labeling them. Hope this
helps
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Joe Polk [mailto:listuser@javelinux.com]
| Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:41 AM
| To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
| Subject: Porn Spam
|
| I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He
is
| setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but
nothing
| seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
| coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there a
| good list of known spamming porn domains we could plug into hosts.deny or
| something?
|
| --
| <<JAV>>
|
|
|
|
RE: Porn Spam
Posted by Jon McGreevy <mc...@waterloo.k12.ia.us>.
I made a few custom rules for SA
I did a rawbody test for /jpg/i
Also another rawbody for /gif/i
And then gave these two point values just above the value of spam like I
have mine set at 8 and gave each of these a 30. The emails that I have been
getting in were just a weblink and some text. My system is not catching
most of the messages like that coming in and labeling them. Hope this helps
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Polk [mailto:listuser@javelinux.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:41 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Porn Spam
I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He is
setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but nothing
seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
coming out to target porn. Is it ready? Anyone have any advise? Is there a
good list of known spamming porn domains we could plug into hosts.deny or
something?
--
<<JAV>>