You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2014/05/25 16:32:39 UTC
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5
corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled.
> On , Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up
> WEB-INF/beans.xml.
> That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship thisbinary.
>
> The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
>> >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether we can
> defer this
>> to 1.2.6...
>> Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it run.
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark
> <be...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a patch
> that
>> resolves the
>>> issue in my testing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg
> <st...@yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Joe!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or
> tomorrow and
>> will
>>>> abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
>>>>
>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark
>>> <be...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I can
> tell
>> it
>>> appears
>>>> to
>>>> > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated (at
> least
>> on my
>>>> > machine).
>>>> >
>>>> > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery & CdiArchive
> are
>>> showing URLs
>>>> > for my classes directory that look like:
>>>> >
> file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
>>>> >
>>>> > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what appears
> to be
>> a
>>>> correct
>>>> > String
>>>
> "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
>>>> > from
>>>> > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:" again
> here
>> on
>>> line 156:
>>>> >
>>>> > //X TODO check!
>>>> > addPath = "file:" + url +
>>>> > "META-INF/beans.xml";
>>>> >
>>>> > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is added
> to
>> the
>>> list
>>>> of
>>>> > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this is a
> small
>>>> > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>> > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g. [1]
> and
>> [2])
>>> and all
>>>> > tests
>>>> >> look fine.
>>>> >> -> +1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> regards,
>>>> >> gerhard
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
>>>> >> [2]
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark
>>> <be...@apache.org>:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > I set up my build environment on a new machine, so
> its
>>> possible
>>>> > I'm
>>>> >> > fighting a configuration problem, but after a
>> successful
>>> build from
>>>> > the
>>>> >> > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with the
> guess
>>
>>> sample app
>>>> > which is
>>>> >> my
>>>> >> > normal go-to for quick testing.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > It looks like an EL or bean discovery problem, as
>> loginBean
>>> isn't
>>>> > being
>>>> >> > found. I'll do a bit more digging but was
> curious
>> if
>>> anyone had
>>>> > luck
>>>> >> with
>>>> >> > the samples or the guess sample app in particular.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David Blevins
>>>> > <david.blevins@gmail.com
>>>> >> > >wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > > +1
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > --
>>>> >> > > David Blevins
>>>> >> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
>>>> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark Struberg
>>>> > <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing
>
>> Apache
>>>> > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > This is a maintenance release of the
>> owb_1.2.x
>>> branch and
>>>> > targets the
>>>> >> > > CDI-1.0 specification.
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > The ReleaseNotes are available online:
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > Maven staging repo:
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > SVN source tag:
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > Source Release:
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > Binary release:
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
>>>> >> > > > [ ] +1 approve
>>>> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> >> > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > Here is my +1
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > >
>>>> >> > > > LieGrue,
>>>> >> > > > strub
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5
Posted by Joseph Bergmark <be...@gmail.com>.
-1
>From my (admittedly limited) perspective, in 1.2.4 you could use the
jetty:run target to run our samples, and in 1.2.5 you can't due to the
changes in OWB-953, which means we have regressed "file:/" urls. I'll be
the first to admit that may not be a pervasive use case.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Continue and here is my +1 then.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2014-05-25 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1 since all other binaries are ok and this is pluggable (worse case)
> >
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2014-05-25 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> >
> > > hmm oki looked at it once again and it seems this has been broken since
> > > quite some time really.
> > > So it's not a recent regression since 1.2.4 but broken since quite some
> > > time.
> > >
> > > I'd say we can continue the VOTE? wdym?
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:33, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On , Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > > >> > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up
> > > >> WEB-INF/beans.xml.
> > > >> That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship
> > > > thisbinary.
> > > >>
> > > >> The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
> > > >>
> > > >> txs and LieGrue,
> > > >> strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>> >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether
> we
> > > > can
> > > >> defer this
> > > >>> to 1.2.6...
> > > >>> Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it
> > > > run.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> LieGrue,
> > > >>> strub
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark
> > > >> <be...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a
> > > > patch
> > > >> that
> > > >>> resolves the
> > > >>>> issue in my testing.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg
> > > >> <st...@yahoo.de>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi Joe!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or
> > > >> tomorrow and
> > > >>> will
> > > >>>>> abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> > > >>>>> strub
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark
> > > >>>> <be...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>> > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I
> > > > can
> > > >> tell
> > > >>> it
> > > >>>> appears
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>> > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated
> > > > (at
> > > >> least
> > > >>> on my
> > > >>>>> > machine).
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery &
> > > > CdiArchive
> > > >> are
> > > >>>> showing URLs
> > > >>>>> > for my classes directory that look like:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >> file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what
> > > > appears
> > > >> to be
> > > >>> a
> > > >>>>> correct
> > > >>>>> > String
> > > >>>>
> > > >> "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
> > > >>>>> > from
> > > >>>>> > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:"
> > > > again
> > > >> here
> > > >>> on
> > > >>>> line 156:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > //X TODO check!
> > > >>>>> > addPath = "file:" + url +
> > > >>>>> > "META-INF/beans.xml";
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is
> > > > added
> > > >> to
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>> list
> > > >>>>> of
> > > >>>>> > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this
> > > > is a
> > > >> small
> > > >>>>> > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> > > >>>>> > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >> i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g.
> > > > [1]
> > > >> and
> > > >>> [2])
> > > >>>> and all
> > > >>>>> > tests
> > > >>>>> >> look fine.
> > > >>>>> >> -> +1
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >> regards,
> > > >>>>> >> gerhard
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >> [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
> > > >>>>> >> [2]
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >> 2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark
> > > >>>> <be...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >> > I set up my build environment on a new
> > > > machine, so
> > > >> its
> > > >>>> possible
> > > >>>>> > I'm
> > > >>>>> >> > fighting a configuration problem, but after a
> > > >
> > > >>> successful
> > > >>>> build from
> > > >>>>> > the
> > > >>>>> >> > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with
> > > > the
> > > >> guess
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> sample app
> > > >>>>> > which is
> > > >>>>> >> my
> > > >>>>> >> > normal go-to for quick testing.
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >> > It looks like an EL or bean discovery
> > > > problem, as
> > > >>> loginBean
> > > >>>> isn't
> > > >>>>> > being
> > > >>>>> >> > found. I'll do a bit more digging but
> > > > was
> > > >> curious
> > > >>> if
> > > >>>> anyone had
> > > >>>>> > luck
> > > >>>>> >> with
> > > >>>>> >> > the samples or the guess sample app in
> > > > particular.
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David
> > > > Blevins
> > > >>>>> > <david.blevins@gmail.com
> > > >>>>> >> > >wrote:
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >> > > +1
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > --
> > > >>>>> >> > > David Blevins
> > > >>>>> >> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > > >>>>> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark
> > > > Struberg
> > > >>>>> > <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on
> > > > releasing
> > > >>
> > > >>> Apache
> > > >>>>> > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > This is a maintenance release of
> > > > the
> > > >>> owb_1.2.x
> > > >>>> branch and
> > > >>>>> > targets the
> > > >>>>> >> > > CDI-1.0 specification.
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > The ReleaseNotes are available
> > > > online:
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > Maven staging repo:
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > SVN source tag:
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>
> > > >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > Source Release:
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > Binary release:
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >>>>> >> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > >>>>> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>> >> > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > Here is my +1
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > >
> > > >>>>> >> > > > LieGrue,
> > > >>>>> >> > > > strub
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> > >
> > > >>>>> >> >
> > > >>>>> >>
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Continue and here is my +1 then.
JLouis
2014-05-25 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> +1 since all other binaries are ok and this is pluggable (worse case)
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-05-25 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>
> > hmm oki looked at it once again and it seems this has been broken since
> > quite some time really.
> > So it's not a recent regression since 1.2.4 but broken since quite some
> > time.
> >
> > I'd say we can continue the VOTE? wdym?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:33, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On , Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > >> > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up
> > >> WEB-INF/beans.xml.
> > >> That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship
> > > thisbinary.
> > >>
> > >> The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
> > >>
> > >> txs and LieGrue,
> > >> strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether we
> > > can
> > >> defer this
> > >>> to 1.2.6...
> > >>> Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it
> > > run.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> LieGrue,
> > >>> strub
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark
> > >> <be...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a
> > > patch
> > >> that
> > >>> resolves the
> > >>>> issue in my testing.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg
> > >> <st...@yahoo.de>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Joe!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or
> > >> tomorrow and
> > >>> will
> > >>>>> abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> > >>>>> strub
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark
> > >>>> <be...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I
> > > can
> > >> tell
> > >>> it
> > >>>> appears
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>> > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated
> > > (at
> > >> least
> > >>> on my
> > >>>>> > machine).
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery &
> > > CdiArchive
> > >> are
> > >>>> showing URLs
> > >>>>> > for my classes directory that look like:
> > >>>>> >
> > >> file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what
> > > appears
> > >> to be
> > >>> a
> > >>>>> correct
> > >>>>> > String
> > >>>>
> > >> "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
> > >>>>> > from
> > >>>>> > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:"
> > > again
> > >> here
> > >>> on
> > >>>> line 156:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > //X TODO check!
> > >>>>> > addPath = "file:" + url +
> > >>>>> > "META-INF/beans.xml";
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is
> > > added
> > >> to
> > >>> the
> > >>>> list
> > >>>>> of
> > >>>>> > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this
> > > is a
> > >> small
> > >>>>> > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> > >>>>> > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >> i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g.
> > > [1]
> > >> and
> > >>> [2])
> > >>>> and all
> > >>>>> > tests
> > >>>>> >> look fine.
> > >>>>> >> -> +1
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> regards,
> > >>>>> >> gerhard
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
> > >>>>> >> [2]
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> 2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark
> > >>>> <be...@apache.org>:
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >> > I set up my build environment on a new
> > > machine, so
> > >> its
> > >>>> possible
> > >>>>> > I'm
> > >>>>> >> > fighting a configuration problem, but after a
> > >
> > >>> successful
> > >>>> build from
> > >>>>> > the
> > >>>>> >> > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with
> > > the
> > >> guess
> > >>>
> > >>>> sample app
> > >>>>> > which is
> > >>>>> >> my
> > >>>>> >> > normal go-to for quick testing.
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >> > It looks like an EL or bean discovery
> > > problem, as
> > >>> loginBean
> > >>>> isn't
> > >>>>> > being
> > >>>>> >> > found. I'll do a bit more digging but
> > > was
> > >> curious
> > >>> if
> > >>>> anyone had
> > >>>>> > luck
> > >>>>> >> with
> > >>>>> >> > the samples or the guess sample app in
> > > particular.
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David
> > > Blevins
> > >>>>> > <david.blevins@gmail.com
> > >>>>> >> > >wrote:
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >> > > +1
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> > > --
> > >>>>> >> > > David Blevins
> > >>>>> >> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > >>>>> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark
> > > Struberg
> > >>>>> > <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on
> > > releasing
> > >>
> > >>> Apache
> > >>>>> > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > This is a maintenance release of
> > > the
> > >>> owb_1.2.x
> > >>>> branch and
> > >>>>> > targets the
> > >>>>> >> > > CDI-1.0 specification.
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > The ReleaseNotes are available
> > > online:
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > Maven staging repo:
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > SVN source tag:
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > Source Release:
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > Binary release:
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
> > >>>>> >> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > >>>>> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>>> >> > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > Here is my +1
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > >
> > >>>>> >> > > > LieGrue,
> > >>>>> >> > > > strub
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> > >
> > >>>>> >> >
> > >>>>> >>
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 since all other binaries are ok and this is pluggable (worse case)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-05-25 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> hmm oki looked at it once again and it seems this has been broken since
> quite some time really.
> So it's not a recent regression since 1.2.4 but broken since quite some
> time.
>
> I'd say we can continue the VOTE? wdym?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:33, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On , Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >> > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up
> >> WEB-INF/beans.xml.
> >> That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship
> > thisbinary.
> >>
> >> The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>> >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether we
> > can
> >> defer this
> >>> to 1.2.6...
> >>> Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it
> > run.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark
> >> <be...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a
> > patch
> >> that
> >>> resolves the
> >>>> issue in my testing.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg
> >> <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Joe!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or
> >> tomorrow and
> >>> will
> >>>>> abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>>>> strub
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark
> >>>> <be...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I
> > can
> >> tell
> >>> it
> >>>> appears
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated
> > (at
> >> least
> >>> on my
> >>>>> > machine).
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery &
> > CdiArchive
> >> are
> >>>> showing URLs
> >>>>> > for my classes directory that look like:
> >>>>> >
> >> file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what
> > appears
> >> to be
> >>> a
> >>>>> correct
> >>>>> > String
> >>>>
> >> "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
> >>>>> > from
> >>>>> > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:"
> > again
> >> here
> >>> on
> >>>> line 156:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > //X TODO check!
> >>>>> > addPath = "file:" + url +
> >>>>> > "META-INF/beans.xml";
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is
> > added
> >> to
> >>> the
> >>>> list
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this
> > is a
> >> small
> >>>>> > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
> >>>>> > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >> i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g.
> > [1]
> >> and
> >>> [2])
> >>>> and all
> >>>>> > tests
> >>>>> >> look fine.
> >>>>> >> -> +1
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> regards,
> >>>>> >> gerhard
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
> >>>>> >> [2]
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> 2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark
> >>>> <be...@apache.org>:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> > I set up my build environment on a new
> > machine, so
> >> its
> >>>> possible
> >>>>> > I'm
> >>>>> >> > fighting a configuration problem, but after a
> >
> >>> successful
> >>>> build from
> >>>>> > the
> >>>>> >> > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with
> > the
> >> guess
> >>>
> >>>> sample app
> >>>>> > which is
> >>>>> >> my
> >>>>> >> > normal go-to for quick testing.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > It looks like an EL or bean discovery
> > problem, as
> >>> loginBean
> >>>> isn't
> >>>>> > being
> >>>>> >> > found. I'll do a bit more digging but
> > was
> >> curious
> >>> if
> >>>> anyone had
> >>>>> > luck
> >>>>> >> with
> >>>>> >> > the samples or the guess sample app in
> > particular.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David
> > Blevins
> >>>>> > <david.blevins@gmail.com
> >>>>> >> > >wrote:
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > > +1
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > --
> >>>>> >> > > David Blevins
> >>>>> >> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> >>>>> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark
> > Struberg
> >>>>> > <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on
> > releasing
> >>
> >>> Apache
> >>>>> > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > This is a maintenance release of
> > the
> >>> owb_1.2.x
> >>>> branch and
> >>>>> > targets the
> >>>>> >> > > CDI-1.0 specification.
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > The ReleaseNotes are available
> > online:
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > Maven staging repo:
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > SVN source tag:
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > Source Release:
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > Binary release:
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>>> >> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>> >> > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > Here is my +1
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > >
> >>>>> >> > > > LieGrue,
> >>>>> >> > > > strub
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 1.2.5
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
hmm oki looked at it once again and it seems this has been broken since quite some time really.
So it's not a recent regression since 1.2.4 but broken since quite some time.
I'd say we can continue the VOTE? wdym?
LieGrue,
strub
> On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:33, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >
>
> corrected subject: VOTE got cancelled.
>
>
>
>
>
>> On , Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> > oki reviewed it again and the effect is that we do not pick up
>> WEB-INF/beans.xml.
>> That means that we do not pass the TCK and as such must not ship
> thisbinary.
>>
>> The VOTE is CANCELLED and I gonna fix it and re-roll the release.
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 16:18, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> wrote:
>>> >t he question is whether this is a heavy regression or whether we
> can
>> defer this
>>> to 1.2.6...
>>> Given that 1.2.4 worked and we only fixed a few bugs I'd let it
> run.
>>>
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 22:23, Joseph Bergmark
>> <be...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> > No problem, I've opened a JIRA issue and attached a
> patch
>> that
>>> resolves the
>>>> issue in my testing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Mark Struberg
>> <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Joe!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for checking. I'll try to reproduce tonight or
>> tomorrow and
>>> will
>>>>> abort the VOTE if I can reproduce it.
>>>>>
>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 21:22, Joseph Bergmark
>>>> <be...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > I walked though the code in debug, and from what I
> can
>> tell
>>> it
>>>> appears
>>>>> to
>>>>> > be an issue with the way the URLs are being generated
> (at
>> least
>>> on my
>>>>> > machine).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > My breakpoints in AbstractMetaDataDiscovery &
> CdiArchive
>> are
>>>> showing URLs
>>>>> > for my classes directory that look like:
>>>>> >
>> file:file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > WebScannerService createURLFromMarkerFile has what
> appears
>> to be
>>> a
>>>>> correct
>>>>> > String
>>>>
>> "file:/C:/workspaces/owb-1.2.5/samples/guess/target/classes/"
>>>>> > from
>>>>> > findBeansXmlBases, but it prepends "file:"
> again
>> here
>>> on
>>>> line 156:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > //X TODO check!
>>>>> > addPath = "file:" + url +
>>>>> > "META-INF/beans.xml";
>>>>> >
>>>>> > OWB-953 changed this class so that addPath is what is
> added
>> to
>>> the
>>>> list
>>>>> of
>>>>> > URLs as previously it used url, so it is possible this
> is a
>> small
>>>>> > regression for non-jar based URLs in web modules.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
>>>>> > gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> i've upgraded several projects to v1.2.5 (e.g.
> [1]
>> and
>>> [2])
>>>> and all
>>>>> > tests
>>>>> >> look fine.
>>>>> >> -> +1
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> regards,
>>>>> >> gerhard
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
>>>>> >> [2]
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 2014-05-24 20:24 GMT+02:00 Joseph Bergmark
>>>> <be...@apache.org>:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > I set up my build environment on a new
> machine, so
>> its
>>>> possible
>>>>> > I'm
>>>>> >> > fighting a configuration problem, but after a
>
>>> successful
>>>> build from
>>>>> > the
>>>>> >> > 1.2.5 source zip, I'm having trouble with
> the
>> guess
>>>
>>>> sample app
>>>>> > which is
>>>>> >> my
>>>>> >> > normal go-to for quick testing.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > It looks like an EL or bean discovery
> problem, as
>>> loginBean
>>>> isn't
>>>>> > being
>>>>> >> > found. I'll do a bit more digging but
> was
>> curious
>>> if
>>>> anyone had
>>>>> > luck
>>>>> >> with
>>>>> >> > the samples or the guess sample app in
> particular.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David
> Blevins
>>>>> > <david.blevins@gmail.com
>>>>> >> > >wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > > +1
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > --
>>>>> >> > > David Blevins
>>>>> >> > > http://twitter.com/dblevins
>>>>> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > On May 23, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Mark
> Struberg
>>>>> > <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on
> releasing
>>
>>> Apache
>>>>> > OpenWebBeans-1.2.5 .
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > This is a maintenance release of
> the
>>> owb_1.2.x
>>>> branch and
>>>>> > targets the
>>>>> >> > > CDI-1.0 specification.
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > The ReleaseNotes are available
> online:
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310844&version=12326814
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > Maven staging repo:
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > SVN source tag:
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >>
>>>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.2.5/
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > Source Release:
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.2.5/openwebbeans-1.2.5-source-release.zip
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > Binary release:
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1004/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.2.5/openwebbeans-distribution-1.2.5-binary.zip
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > PGP release key 2FDB81B1
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/KEYS
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > The VOTE will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>> >> > > > [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> >> > > > [ ] -1 veto (and reason why)
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > Here is my +1
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > >
>>>>> >> > > > LieGrue,
>>>>> >> > > > strub
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>