You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@groovy.apache.org by Paco Zarate <co...@nazcasistemas.com> on 2016/03/01 18:57:43 UTC

Re: [GitHub] groovy pull request: Link to MrHaki's blog in TupleConstructor jav...

Is it possible to include blog links or samples as:
"External References:"
?

I think that someone that wants to help with the documentation can have a
very good starting point with the external references on hand, and it is
very clear that is not the "Official documentation"

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:40PM, Cédric Champeau wrote:
> > 2016-02-29 18:37 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Sorry for a delay in the answer...
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:01PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 27.02.2016 05:26, Aseem Bansal wrote:
> > > > >Hi Konstantin Boudnik
> > > > >
> > > > >Are the things on groovy-lang not considered originating from Apache
> > > > >premises?
> > >
> > > Where the code for groovy-lang is hosted? That will answer your
> question.
> > >
> >
> > The website itself is in its own Git repo. However, the docs that it
> > contains are hosted into the main Apache Groovy Git repo.
>
> Then it seems to be originating from the Apache, as far as I can tell.
>
> > > > If we link to Mr Hakis blog, and that is seen as Docs, then we have
> > > > external Docs, which do not originate from the ASF. In my opinion no
> > > > problem, since these are blog posts and not docs. Especially not
> > > > since his blog is about more than Groovy alone
> > >
> > > That could be fine if the link is explicitly external and not included
> into
> > > the release _materially_, ie the content isn't copied into the release
> zip,
> > > etc. Because then will have to figure out about the status of this
> > > contribution, licensing, and all that jazz.
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
>