Re: Jena 2.11.2 release? (JENA-705)

[Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>]

JENA-705 is solved (yipee! - completely different issue to what I expected!)

There /may/ be a slight performance regression on memory models - I only 
noticed because I was repeated running code and the timing had 
stabilised so smaller difference in figures were noticable.

If there is, it's in memory models only.  I'll investigate.

As it stands at the moment I don't think it's a  a blocker because I 
couldn't write a JIRA as to what's happening.

Of course, as soon as a release is done X zillion emails will turn up 
with real facts :-)

	Andy



On 29/05/14 15:20, Rob Vesse wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't have any issues assigned to me that need to get into 2.11.2 nor am
> I aware of any blockers other than the JENA-705 sequence bug Andy is
> looking at
>
> Who wants to be RM for the release?  I am happy to volunteer if no-one
> else has a strong desire to run this release
>
> Rob
>
> On 29/05/2014 14:05, "Claude Warren" <cl...@xenei.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a plan to me
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Are we ready for a Jena 2.11.2 release, the last Java6 release?
>>>
>>> I know of JENA-705 which needs at least investigating.
>>>
>>> Outline:
>>>
>>> * release Jena 2.11.2
>>>
>>> * throw the big java6/7 switch
>>>       - do some clearing up (small scale stuff, warnings etc)
>>>
>>> * Final RDF 1.1 isms.
>>>
>>> * wait (about a month?) to see if anything nasty crawls out
>>>
>>> * release Jena 2.12.0
>>>
>>> Sound like a plan?
>>>
>>>          Andy
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the
>> web<http://like-like.xenei.com>
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>
>
>
>

Re: Jena 2.11.2 release? (JENA-705)

[Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>]

On 30/05/14 10:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> JENA-705 is solved (yipee! - completely different issue to what I
> expected!)
>
> There /may/ be a slight performance regression on memory models - I only
> noticed because I was repeated running code and the timing had
> stabilised so smaller difference in figures were noticable.
>
> If there is, it's in memory models only.  I'll investigate.

Regression de-regressed.  It was a April change and some debug setting 
had got into the code base.   My bad.

	Andy

>
> As it stands at the moment I don't think it's a  a blocker because I
> couldn't write a JIRA as to what's happening.
>
> Of course, as soon as a release is done X zillion emails will turn up
> with real facts :-)
>
>      Andy
>
>
>
> On 29/05/14 15:20, Rob Vesse wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I don't have any issues assigned to me that need to get into 2.11.2
>> nor am
>> I aware of any blockers other than the JENA-705 sequence bug Andy is
>> looking at
>>
>> Who wants to be RM for the release?  I am happy to volunteer if no-one
>> else has a strong desire to run this release
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On 29/05/2014 14:05, "Claude Warren" <cl...@xenei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like a plan to me
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are we ready for a Jena 2.11.2 release, the last Java6 release?
>>>>
>>>> I know of JENA-705 which needs at least investigating.
>>>>
>>>> Outline:
>>>>
>>>> * release Jena 2.11.2
>>>>
>>>> * throw the big java6/7 switch
>>>>       - do some clearing up (small scale stuff, warnings etc)
>>>>
>>>> * Final RDF 1.1 isms.
>>>>
>>>> * wait (about a month?) to see if anything nasty crawls out
>>>>
>>>> * release Jena 2.12.0
>>>>
>>>> Sound like a plan?
>>>>
>>>>          Andy
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the
>>> web<http://like-like.xenei.com>
>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>