[jira] [Commented] (DAFFODIL-1605) Update Wiki based on CII best practices review

["Steve Lawrence (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17278822#comment-17278822 ] 

Steve Lawrence commented on DAFFODIL-1605:
------------------------------------------

The Apache Maturity Model for Daffodil is completed here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Apache+Daffodil+Maturity+Model+Assessment

I don't think we gain much value from maintaining both, and Apache model is preferred.

> Update Wiki based on CII best practices review
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-1605
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1605
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation, Infrastructure
>            Reporter: Mike Beckerle
>            Priority: Minor
>
> See
> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/357
> The self-certification questionnaire should also be reviewed. MikeB filled it in, but guessed on a few things that seemed not applicable, but didn't have N/A as a choice.
> Since they gave us 100% rating (despite fuzz testing issue below), I dropped their badge on our wiki front page, but removed it pending review by Steve Lawrence of the questionnaire answers.
> Also JIRA DFDL-1602. The above self-certification questionnaire reminded me that we're not doing fuzz testing but clearly we should. They gave us 100% rating anyway, even though this fuzz testing requirement was listed as "not met", but this is also based on some guesses on my part about a few of the other questionnaire answers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)