You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 1998/06/02 00:38:13 UTC
1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
1.3.0 is now tagged and rolled. Let's test it out, make sure it looks
good and then shoot for the announcement on Friday!!
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/
"That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"
Re: 1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
Posted by Ben Laurie <be...@algroup.co.uk>.
Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 08:52:21PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> > >
> > > Dunno if this is important, but the dates on the tarballs are one year
> > > off (1997).
> >
> > Hmmm... I don't see that. :/
>
> Weeird. I no longer see it either. I wasn't seeing things, because
> ls -lt was sorting them with the b3 stuff.
I'll wager its a timezone thang.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/
WE'RE RECRUITING! http://www.aldigital.co.uk/recruit/
Re: 1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
Posted by Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com>.
On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 08:52:21PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> >
> > Dunno if this is important, but the dates on the tarballs are one year
> > off (1997).
>
> Hmmm... I don't see that. :/
Weeird. I no longer see it either. I wasn't seeing things, because
ls -lt was sorting them with the b3 stuff.
--
Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/
"...and as she finally reached orgasm, she screamed 'the mail server
will be down for three hours tonight! Yes! Oh, yes!'" -- J.D. Falk
Re: 1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>.
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 06:38:13PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > 1.3.0 is now tagged and rolled. Let's test it out, make sure it looks
> > good and then shoot for the announcement on Friday!!
>
> Dunno if this is important, but the dates on the tarballs are one year
> off (1997).
Just wishful thinking. <g>
Re: 1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
Posted by Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com>.
On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 06:38:13PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 1.3.0 is now tagged and rolled. Let's test it out, make sure it looks
> good and then shoot for the announcement on Friday!!
Dunno if this is important, but the dates on the tarballs are one year
off (1997).
Compiles and serves pages and simple CGI scripts under Red Hat 5.0 and
5.1.
I'll test under AIX 4.2 tomorrow.
--
Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/
"Life is like an analogy." - Aaron Allston
Re: 1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
Posted by Bill Stoddard <re...@ibm.net>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 1.3.0 is now tagged and rolled. Let's test it out, make sure it looks
> good and then shoot for the announcement on Friday!!
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Jim Jagielski ||| jim@jaguNET.com ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/
> "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul,
> cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on"
Win NT compiles, serves static pages, serves compiled CGI scripts and
servesPerl CGI scripts. Env vars are passed into CGI scripts. SSI exec cgi
seems to
work. SSI exec cmd is still broken.
Bill Stoddard
Re: 1.3.0. Tagged and Rolled!!
Posted by Alvaro Martinez Echevarria <al...@lander.es>.
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 1.3.0 is now tagged and rolled. Let's test it out, make sure it looks
> good and then shoot for the announcement on Friday!!
It compiles out of the box and runs smoothly on Linux (Debian
2.0, i.e., hamm). By the way, I did some silly speed tests on a
fast machine (PII/300), using the network loopback, and it's
really impressive: 600 requests per second on a static page
(htdocs/manual/index.html, 2KB), 150 requests per second on a
tiny dinamic one (using a <!--#if expr="$foo" --> structure, 600
bytes). I registered no errors after more than 70K requests.
Looks good :-).
Regards.
.------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Alvaro Martínez Echevarría | LANDER SISTEMAS |
| alvaro@lander.es | Pº Castellana, 121 |
`--------------------------------| 28046 Madrid, SPAIN |
| Tel: +34-91-5562883 |
| Fax: +34-91-5563001 |
`---------------------------------'