You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com> on 2004/02/11 14:11:54 UTC
Geronimo specs jars
The classpath is getting very long, too long for us living in the
exciting world of Microsoft. I propose that we merge all the specs
projects into one. With that said, the merged spec project should
probably go into modules.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
Re: groupId, was: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@coredevelopers.net>.
On Feb 12, 2004, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> david.blevins@visi.com wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:29:34PM -0600, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>> I like the idea of a geronimo-spec-j2ee.jar file. That way users
>>> will be able to add one thing when writing a j2ee app. I think we
>>> should have a spec/j2ee project that does this. I'll even write it
>>> if we can get everyone to agree.
>>>
>
> The groupId for this is geronimo-j2ee but the id is geronimo-spec-j2ee.
>
> Which is right?
Sorry that was a typo... I change it to geronimo-j2ee.
-dain
groupId, was: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <je...@coredevelopers.net>.
david.blevins@visi.com wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:29:34PM -0600, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>>I like the idea of a geronimo-spec-j2ee.jar file. That way users will
>>be able to add one thing when writing a j2ee app. I think we should
>>have a spec/j2ee project that does this. I'll even write it if we can
>>get everyone to agree.
>>
>
The groupId for this is geronimo-j2ee but the id is geronimo-spec-j2ee.
Which is right?
--
Jeremy
Re: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by da...@visi.com.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:29:34PM -0600, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I like the idea of a geronimo-spec-j2ee.jar file. That way users will
> be able to add one thing when writing a j2ee app. I think we should
> have a spec/j2ee project that does this. I'll even write it if we can
> get everyone to agree.
>
+1
--
David Blevins
Re: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@coredevelopers.net>.
On Feb 11, 2004, at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>> I like the idea of a geronimo-spec-j2ee.jar file. That way users will
>> be able to add one thing when writing a j2ee app. I think we should
>> have a spec/j2ee project that does this. I'll even write it if we
>> can get everyone to agree.
>
> +1 - especially if you're going to write it :-)
Done... wish I hadn't offered to write it. What a PITA.
-dain
Re: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <je...@coredevelopers.net>.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I like the idea of a geronimo-spec-j2ee.jar file. That way users will be
> able to add one thing when writing a j2ee app. I think we should have a
> spec/j2ee project that does this. I'll even write it if we can get
> everyone to agree.
>
+1 - especially if you're going to write it :-)
It should at least contain all J2EE API classes as described by the
standard (see the J2EE JavaDoc for example).
--
Jeremy
Re: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@coredevelopers.net>.
I like the idea of a geronimo-spec-j2ee.jar file. That way users will
be able to add one thing when writing a j2ee app. I think we should
have a spec/j2ee project that does this. I'll even write it if we can
get everyone to agree.
-dain
/*************************
* Dain Sundstrom
* Partner
* Core Developers Network
*************************/
On Feb 11, 2004, at 8:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> Conceptually I'm not in favor of this. We will only get more modules
> as we go on, and smushing more or less unrelated pieces together might
> lead to unbounded confusion.
>
> What are the circumstances under which you get this problem? Due to
> the packaging I doubt it is while trying to run geronimo.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 05:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> The classpath is getting very long, too long for us living in the
>> exciting world of Microsoft. I propose that we merge all the specs
>> projects into one. With that said, the merged spec project should
>> probably go into modules.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Geronimo specs jars
Posted by David Jencks <da...@coredevelopers.net>.
Conceptually I'm not in favor of this. We will only get more modules
as we go on, and smushing more or less unrelated pieces together might
lead to unbounded confusion.
What are the circumstances under which you get this problem? Due to
the packaging I doubt it is while trying to run geronimo.
thanks
david jencks
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 05:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> The classpath is getting very long, too long for us living in the
> exciting world of Microsoft. I propose that we merge all the specs
> projects into one. With that said, the merged spec project should
> probably go into modules.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Alan
>
>
>