[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3324) Evaluation with restriction is not consistent with parent ACLs

["Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tobias Bocanegra updated OAK-3324:
----------------------------------
    Summary: Evaluation with restriction is not consistent with parent ACLs  (was: hasPermission does not reflect actual behavior with restrictions)

> Evaluation with restriction is not consistent with parent ACLs
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3324
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3324
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.4
>            Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>            Assignee: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> consider the following ACL setup:
> {noformat}
> testuser allow rep:read,rep:write      /testroot
> testuser deny  jcr:removeNode /testroot/a  glob=*/c
> testuser allow jcr:removeNode /testroot/a  glob=*/b
> {noformat}
> now: {{hasPermission(/tesroot/a/b/c, jcr:removeNode) == false}} but the user is still able to delete the node.
> * if we change the order of the ACEs with the restriction, it works (i.e. the user can't delete)
> * if we use direct ACLs on the respective nodes, it works
> I think this is a bug...but I'm not sure if {{hasPermission}} is wrong, or the check during node deletion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)