[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-128) Ignite does need thin-client APIs as all public APIs can be used on clients

["Yakov Zhdanov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14316435#comment-14316435 ] 

Yakov Zhdanov commented on IGNITE-128:
--------------------------------------

pls remove branch

> Ignite does need thin-client APIs as all public APIs can be used on clients
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-128
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-128
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: sprint-1
>            Reporter: Dmitriy Setrakyan
>            Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: sprint-1
>
>
> I believe the whole "client" package can be moved to "internal" is it is only used internally by JDBC driver. Going forward we will refactor the JDBC driver to use standard GridGain APIs.
> Note, that we still need some configuration to remain in Ignite in order to support HTTP connectivity over Jetty or Memcached connectivity.
> For that we should rename {{ClientConnectionConfiguration}} to {{org.apache.ignite.configuration.ConnectorConfiguration}} with leave the following properties:
> - jettyPath
> - restPortRange -> rename to tcpPortRange
> - restAccessibleFolders should be removed together with "log" command which needs it.
> - restExecSvc -> execSvc
> - restSvcShutdown -> svcShutdown (do we need it?)
> - clientMsgInterceptor -> msgInterceptor



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)