bayes + net scores on 3.02 vs 2.64

[Martin Hepworth <ma...@solid-state-logic.com>]

all

Tinkering with a new box for my SA and just noticed that the bayes + net 
score in 3.02 is a lower than in 2.64 and lower for bayes only.

why?

--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************

Re: bayes + net scores on 3.02 vs 2.64

[Matt Kettler <mk...@evi-inc.com>]

At 12:46 PM 1/7/2005, Martin Hepworth wrote:
>all
>
>Tinkering with a new box for my SA and just noticed that the bayes + net 
>score in 3.02 is a lower than in 2.64 and lower for bayes only.
>
>why?

As best I can tell it's score dilution by the URIBLs from SURBL.

See this post from the archives, which covers a similar note:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/61489