You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Dain Sundstrom (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2006/05/11 20:07:06 UTC
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2012) Reflect configuration -> module
change in config.xml
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2012?page=all ]
Dain Sundstrom updated GERONIMO-2012:
-------------------------------------
Attachment: 2012.patch
> Reflect configuration -> module change in config.xml
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2012
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2012
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: Bug
> Security: public(Regular issues)
> Components: general
> Versions: 1.1
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Joe Bohn
> Assignee: Dain Sundstrom
> Fix For: 1.1
> Attachments: 2012.patch
>
> This JIRA is to capture an issue raised by John Sissino so that we have something to attach a patch created by Dain to while SVN is down.
> The problem was reported in John's note to the dev list:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg22260.html
> text from email:
> I noticed we still have a "configuration" element in the config.xml file.
> I am thinking of doing the following for 1.1:
> * most importantly, change the "configuration" element name to "module" to have consistent terminology considering the recent configId changes.
> * update cmd line help for --override option in Daemon to use "module" terminology.
> * update the wording in the var\config\README.txt to use the "module" terminology.
> * change the --long startup output to use the word "Module" instead of "Configuration" - also give us a bit more room on each line.
> Any objections?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira