You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by hpq852 <hp...@gmail.com> on 2006/12/14 12:40:22 UTC
Persistence connection problem.
I've used MINA1.0 for a TCP server and the server hold the persistence connections of the clients. So the problem is that with the increasing of client number then how to make the server get better throughput ? Because of the persistence connection I can't do server cluster simplely as Session replicating. Does anyone have experience in this field? Any help will be appreciated.
Best Regards
Re: Persistence connection problem.
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
On 12/30/06, wrote:
>
> So when the total number of incoming messages per
> second is very big and one server can't cope with the huge
> throughput, then
> is there any idea to resolve it ?
You could take a look into ReadThrottleFilterBuilder (in
org.apache.mina.filter).
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
Re: Persistence connection problem.
Posted by Jesse Hou <hp...@gmail.com>.
So when the total number of incoming messages per
second is very big and one server can't cope with the huge throughput, then
is there any idea to resolve it ?
Thank you.
On 12/27/06, Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/14/06, hpq852 <hp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've used MINA1.0 for a TCP server and the server hold the persistence
> > connections of the clients. So the problem is that with the increasing
> of
> > client number then how to make the server get better throughput ?
> Because of
> > the persistence connection I can't do server cluster simplely as Session
> > replicating. Does anyone have experience in this field? Any help will
> be
> > appreciated.
>
>
> Well, I think it really depends on the characteristics of your
> application.
> The number of connection is not really important if your application and
> MINA work fine. What important is the total number of incoming messages
> per
> second. If it's small, then I think there's no big problem yet. If the
> number is big, you will have to optimized your server and play with
> various
> thread model candidates.
>
> HTH,
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP key fingerprints:
> * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
> * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
>
>
Re: Persistence connection problem.
Posted by Trustin Lee <tr...@gmail.com>.
On 12/14/06, hpq852 <hp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've used MINA1.0 for a TCP server and the server hold the persistence
> connections of the clients. So the problem is that with the increasing of
> client number then how to make the server get better throughput ? Because of
> the persistence connection I can't do server cluster simplely as Session
> replicating. Does anyone have experience in this field? Any help will be
> appreciated.
Well, I think it really depends on the characteristics of your application.
The number of connection is not really important if your application and
MINA work fine. What important is the total number of incoming messages per
second. If it's small, then I think there's no big problem yet. If the
number is big, you will have to optimized your server and play with various
thread model candidates.
HTH,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6