You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rave.apache.org by Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> on 2012/09/10 20:10:43 UTC

Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all--

We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
(http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and noticed
it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as written (and
didn't if we used 8443).

Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as an
alternative?


Thanks--


Marlon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTi0jAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5P/0H/2D5jHKRKNY+azSRMN8dk8BY
RI9JcQmgfiL+RfhFdv2Od8mlJPP7ubeGxXvvjKSfD9nWFWSduVif5r2PTHL6DfD3
iOCh7BJdU6ZiSjRWfADUfUuansLgnpoMxvddiCyoB/LgfZMDQvq0N4OWTJwt3UAp
Csr346qGcR2B2ayNHqQgQPz91Ueg77+0Q2xry4bi0DlvsvBncNATk8laXwebFOla
7HsowfmwFZgIqEOj/ezK9q0t2ElK9YXh3YKLxXc/f6Lxpi38LtJzu+DdncElAO8A
DrEIJn+Sf7dmUAw7qBWbMLwfQ8rU2IvrfbhMMH0tgGH8p8wwvfnP5QYjE/OKgks=
=GMWw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>.
Indeed

On 12 September 2012 15:37, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Jasha. So, does it mean that I have to update the urls of
> container.js to have 8443 as the port?
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <jasha@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > If you don't specify the port, it will default to 443 for https. For a
> > custom port like 8443 you need to specify it in the configuration files.
> >
> > On 12 September 2012 00:19, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> > heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jasha,
> > >
> > > I updated the urls of the container.js as it is instructed in the
> > tutorial
> > > (ie. Changed http urls to https) but I did not do any port additions in
> > > that file.
> > >
> > > I have following configurations in my portal.properties and
> > > rave.shindig.properties files.
> > >
> > > rave-portal-resources/src/main/resources/portal.properties
> > >
> > > portal.opensocial_engine.protocol=https
> > > portal.opensocial_engine.root=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
> > > portal.opensocial_engine.gadget_path=/gadgets
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> rave-providers/rave-opensocial-provider/rave-opensocial-server/rave-shindig/src/main/resources/rave.shindig.properties
> > >
> > > shindig.host=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
> > > shindig.port=
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <jasha@apache.org
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > It looks like the portal tries to contact Shindig on the default
> port.
> > > Did
> > > > you change all the entries in the container.js as well to use port
> > 8443?
> > > >
> > > > On 11 September 2012 00:07, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> > > > heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Following is the stacktrace.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Heshan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then
> suffered
> > > > > > meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marlon
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> > > > > > > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log
> in,
> > > > > > > but none of the widgets rendered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jasha
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all--
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> > > > > > > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> > > > > > > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> > > > > > > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be
> much
> > > > > > > better for development purposes to not require restricted
> ports.
> > > > > > > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying
> as
> > > > > > > an alternative?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks--
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Marlon
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> > > > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
> > > > > > /+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
> > > > > > ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
> > > > > > SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
> > > > > > c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
> > > > > > 3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
> > > > > > =cWwn
> > > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> > > > >
> > > > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> > >
> > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>
> http://heshans.blogspot.com/
>

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Heshan Suriyaarachchi <he...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jasha. So, does it mean that I have to update the urls of
container.js to have 8443 as the port?

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>wrote:

> If you don't specify the port, it will default to 443 for https. For a
> custom port like 8443 you need to specify it in the configuration files.
>
> On 12 September 2012 00:19, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jasha,
> >
> > I updated the urls of the container.js as it is instructed in the
> tutorial
> > (ie. Changed http urls to https) but I did not do any port additions in
> > that file.
> >
> > I have following configurations in my portal.properties and
> > rave.shindig.properties files.
> >
> > rave-portal-resources/src/main/resources/portal.properties
> >
> > portal.opensocial_engine.protocol=https
> > portal.opensocial_engine.root=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
> > portal.opensocial_engine.gadget_path=/gadgets
> >
> >
> >
> rave-providers/rave-opensocial-provider/rave-opensocial-server/rave-shindig/src/main/resources/rave.shindig.properties
> >
> > shindig.host=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
> > shindig.port=
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <jasha@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > It looks like the portal tries to contact Shindig on the default port.
> > Did
> > > you change all the entries in the container.js as well to use port
> 8443?
> > >
> > > On 11 September 2012 00:07, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> > > heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Following is the stacktrace.
> > > >
> > > > http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Heshan
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
> > > > > meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Marlon
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> > > > > > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
> > > > > > but none of the widgets rendered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jasha
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all--
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> > > > > > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> > > > > > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> > > > > > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
> > > > > > better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
> > > > > > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
> > > > > > an alternative?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks--
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marlon
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> > > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> > > > >
> > > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
> > > > > /+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
> > > > > ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
> > > > > SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
> > > > > c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
> > > > > 3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
> > > > > =cWwn
> > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> > > >
> > > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> >
> > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Heshan Suriyaarachchi

http://heshans.blogspot.com/

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>.
If you don't specify the port, it will default to 443 for https. For a
custom port like 8443 you need to specify it in the configuration files.

On 12 September 2012 00:19, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jasha,
>
> I updated the urls of the container.js as it is instructed in the tutorial
> (ie. Changed http urls to https) but I did not do any port additions in
> that file.
>
> I have following configurations in my portal.properties and
> rave.shindig.properties files.
>
> rave-portal-resources/src/main/resources/portal.properties
>
> portal.opensocial_engine.protocol=https
> portal.opensocial_engine.root=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
> portal.opensocial_engine.gadget_path=/gadgets
>
>
> rave-providers/rave-opensocial-provider/rave-opensocial-server/rave-shindig/src/main/resources/rave.shindig.properties
>
> shindig.host=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
> shindig.port=
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <jasha@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > It looks like the portal tries to contact Shindig on the default port.
> Did
> > you change all the entries in the container.js as well to use port 8443?
> >
> > On 11 September 2012 00:07, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> > heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Following is the stacktrace.
> > >
> > > http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Heshan
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
> > > > meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Marlon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> > > > > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
> > > > > but none of the widgets rendered?
> > > > >
> > > > > Jasha
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all--
> > > > >
> > > > > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> > > > > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> > > > > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> > > > > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
> > > > > better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
> > > > > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
> > > > > an alternative?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks--
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Marlon
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> > > >
> > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
> > > > /+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
> > > > ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
> > > > SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
> > > > c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
> > > > 3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
> > > > =cWwn
> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> > >
> > > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>
> http://heshans.blogspot.com/
>

RE: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org>.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Heshan Suriyaarachchi [mailto:heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:19 PM
>To: dev@rave.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?
>
>Hi Jasha,
>
>I updated the urls of the container.js as it is instructed in the tutorial
>(ie. Changed http urls to https) but I did not do any port additions in
>that file.
>
>I have following configurations in my portal.properties and
>rave.shindig.properties files.
>
>rave-portal-resources/src/main/resources/portal.properties
>
>portal.opensocial_engine.protocol=https
>portal.opensocial_engine.root=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu

This needs to be XXX.XXX.indiana.edu:8443

>portal.opensocial_engine.gadget_path=/gadgets
>
>rave-providers/rave-opensocial-provider/rave-opensocial-server/rave-
>shindig/src/main/resources/rave.shindig.properties
>
>shindig.host=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
>shindig.port=

This needs to be set to 8443

>
>On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal
><ja...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> It looks like the portal tries to contact Shindig on the default port. Did
>> you change all the entries in the container.js as well to use port 8443?
>>
>> On 11 September 2012 00:07, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
>> heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Following is the stacktrace.
>> >
>> > http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Heshan
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
>wrote:
>> >
>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > > Hash: SHA1
>> > >
>> > > We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
>> > > meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Marlon
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
>> > > > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
>> > > > but none of the widgets rendered?
>> > > >
>> > > > Jasha
>> > > >
>> > > > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>
>wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi all--
>> > > >
>> > > > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
>> > > > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
>> > > > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
>> > > > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
>> > > >
>> > > > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
>> > > > better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
>> > > > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
>> > > > an alternative?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks--
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Marlon
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
>> > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>> > >
>> > >
>iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZ
>F
>> > >
>/+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
>> > >
>ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3go
>CqE
>> > >
>SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kz
>k
>> > >
>c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nf
>m
>> > >
>3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow
>0=
>> > > =cWwn
>> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>> >
>> > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Regards,
>Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>
>http://heshans.blogspot.com/

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Heshan Suriyaarachchi <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jasha,

I updated the urls of the container.js as it is instructed in the tutorial
(ie. Changed http urls to https) but I did not do any port additions in
that file.

I have following configurations in my portal.properties and
rave.shindig.properties files.

rave-portal-resources/src/main/resources/portal.properties

portal.opensocial_engine.protocol=https
portal.opensocial_engine.root=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
portal.opensocial_engine.gadget_path=/gadgets

rave-providers/rave-opensocial-provider/rave-opensocial-server/rave-shindig/src/main/resources/rave.shindig.properties

shindig.host=XXX.XXX.indiana.edu
shindig.port=

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>wrote:

> It looks like the portal tries to contact Shindig on the default port. Did
> you change all the entries in the container.js as well to use port 8443?
>
> On 11 September 2012 00:07, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
> heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Following is the stacktrace.
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Heshan
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
> > > meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
> > >
> > >
> > > Marlon
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> > > > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
> > > > but none of the widgets rendered?
> > > >
> > > > Jasha
> > > >
> > > > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all--
> > > >
> > > > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> > > > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> > > > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> > > > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
> > > > better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
> > > > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
> > > > an alternative?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks--
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Marlon
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> > >
> > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
> > > /+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
> > > ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
> > > SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
> > > c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
> > > 3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
> > > =cWwn
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Heshan Suriyaarachchi
> >
> > http://heshans.blogspot.com/
> >
>



-- 
Regards,
Heshan Suriyaarachchi

http://heshans.blogspot.com/

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>.
It looks like the portal tries to contact Shindig on the default port. Did
you change all the entries in the container.js as well to use port 8443?

On 11 September 2012 00:07, Heshan Suriyaarachchi <
heshan.suriyaarachchi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Following is the stacktrace.
>
> http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T
>
> Thanks,
> Heshan
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
> > meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
> >
> >
> > Marlon
> >
> >
> > On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> > > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
> > > but none of the widgets rendered?
> > >
> > > Jasha
> > >
> > > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all--
> > >
> > > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> > > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> > > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> > > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> > >
> > > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
> > > better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
> > > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
> > > an alternative?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks--
> > >
> > >
> > > Marlon
> > >>
> > >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> >
> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
> > /+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
> > ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
> > SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
> > c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
> > 3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
> > =cWwn
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Heshan Suriyaarachchi
>
> http://heshans.blogspot.com/
>

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Heshan Suriyaarachchi <he...@gmail.com>.
Following is the stacktrace.

http://pastebin.com/dnhFhb3T

Thanks,
Heshan

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
> meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.
>
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> > Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
> > but none of the widgets rendered?
> >
> > Jasha
> >
> > On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all--
> >
> > We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> > (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> > noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> > written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> >
> > Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
> > better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
> > Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
> > an alternative?
> >
> >
> > Thanks--
> >
> >
> > Marlon
> >>
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
> /+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
> ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
> SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
> c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
> 3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
> =cWwn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
Regards,
Heshan Suriyaarachchi

http://heshans.blogspot.com/

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We could get to the login page OK if using 8443, but then suffered
meltdown when logging in. We'll dig up the stacktrace.


Marlon


On 9/10/12 3:35 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote:
> Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in,
> but none of the widgets rendered?
> 
> Jasha
> 
> On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi all--
> 
> We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions 
> (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and
> noticed it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as
> written (and didn't if we used 8443).
> 
> Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much 
> better for development purposes to not require restricted ports. 
> Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as
> an alternative?
> 
> 
> Thanks--
> 
> 
> Marlon
>> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTkLkAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5NSYH/2+wCIssx9X9Pp19tJTXJTZF
/+pxK3iIlhF+/7nZ5mWmt3evtwhzR88ETYiZXciwYxmkhqZqcInM6ZrOuAaEYrh1
ThFNOVIJkHvg5XLBTp0tN7d0OWSGNfRaQpzhCXJse0CbLTOCo4KqMd301E3goCqE
SQ3ryhPwHlbLslMDu+PF+dnzJvdF+/BlKbTm/RG/55ECA/ioVN5DkAv9Qd/k3Kzk
c3GXwGJgBioBldXWdG1+lj9HAzgtsIDTIt0GkqR1GR7Y/TPp3n67VSQ2D1qd9Nfm
3Sa6FPRx0rSdmafp69mXZItPuWty2kb9/YN46GZysYMC0/keHw4yzYQFLv5Qow0=
=cWwn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Rave+HTTPS only on Port 443?

Posted by Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org>.
Couldn't you access the portal at all or were you able to log in, but none
of the widgets rendered?

Jasha

On 10 September 2012 20:10, Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all--
>
> We were reviewing the Rave+SSL instructions
> (http://rave.apache.org/documentation/configure-ssl.html) and noticed
> it requires using port 443.  The instructions worked as written (and
> didn't if we used 8443).
>
> Does anyone know the source of this constraint?  It would be much
> better for development purposes to not require restricted ports.
> Also, has anyone looked at using Apache HTTPD + SSL + proxying as an
> alternative?
>
>
> Thanks--
>
>
> Marlon
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQTi0jAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5P/0H/2D5jHKRKNY+azSRMN8dk8BY
> RI9JcQmgfiL+RfhFdv2Od8mlJPP7ubeGxXvvjKSfD9nWFWSduVif5r2PTHL6DfD3
> iOCh7BJdU6ZiSjRWfADUfUuansLgnpoMxvddiCyoB/LgfZMDQvq0N4OWTJwt3UAp
> Csr346qGcR2B2ayNHqQgQPz91Ueg77+0Q2xry4bi0DlvsvBncNATk8laXwebFOla
> 7HsowfmwFZgIqEOj/ezK9q0t2ElK9YXh3YKLxXc/f6Lxpi38LtJzu+DdncElAO8A
> DrEIJn+Sf7dmUAw7qBWbMLwfQ8rU2IvrfbhMMH0tgGH8p8wwvfnP5QYjE/OKgks=
> =GMWw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>