You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@samza.apache.org by "Jim Huang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/09 00:52:07 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SAMZA-102) SamzaAppMasterService.scala -
exception handling onInit() always assume port conflict, very misleading
Jim Huang created SAMZA-102:
-------------------------------
Summary: SamzaAppMasterService.scala - exception handling onInit() always assume port conflict, very misleading
Key: SAMZA-102
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-102
Project: Samza
Issue Type: Bug
Components: container
Affects Versions: 0.6.0
Reporter: Jim Huang
Inside the onInit() method tries to start up WebAppServer, the catch exception only assumes the port number maybe the issue.
{code:title=SamzaAppMasterService.scala} try {
rpcApp = new WebAppServer("/", rpcPort)
rpcApp.addServlet("/*", new ApplicationMasterRestServlet(config, state, registry))
rpcApp.start
webApp = new WebAppServer("/", trackingPort)
webApp.addServlet("/*", new ApplicationMasterWebServlet(config, state))
webApp.start
state.rpcPort = rpcPort
state.trackingPort = trackingPort
return
} catch {
case e: Exception => {
warn("Unable to start webapp on rpc port %d, tracking port %d .. retrying" format (rpcPort, trackingPort))
}
}{code}
In my environment, I was using IBM JDK and after some debugging the issue has nothing to do with port number not been available, but in the Java reflection layer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)