You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@samza.apache.org by "Jim Huang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/09 00:52:07 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SAMZA-102) SamzaAppMasterService.scala - exception handling onInit() always assume port conflict, very misleading

Jim Huang created SAMZA-102:
-------------------------------

             Summary: SamzaAppMasterService.scala - exception handling onInit() always assume port conflict, very misleading
                 Key: SAMZA-102
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-102
             Project: Samza
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: container
    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
            Reporter: Jim Huang


Inside the onInit() method tries to start up WebAppServer, the catch exception only assumes the port number maybe the issue.  

{code:title=SamzaAppMasterService.scala}      try {
        rpcApp = new WebAppServer("/", rpcPort)
        rpcApp.addServlet("/*", new ApplicationMasterRestServlet(config, state, registry))
        rpcApp.start

        webApp = new WebAppServer("/", trackingPort)
        webApp.addServlet("/*", new ApplicationMasterWebServlet(config, state))
        webApp.start

        state.rpcPort = rpcPort
        state.trackingPort = trackingPort
        return
      } catch {
        case e: Exception => {
          warn("Unable to start webapp on rpc port %d, tracking port %d .. retrying" format (rpcPort, trackingPort))
        }
      }{code}

In my environment, I was using IBM JDK and after some debugging the issue has nothing to do with port number not been available, but in the Java reflection layer.  




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)