[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-27907) [hbase-thirdparty] Include netty-tcnative in hbase-shaded-netty

["Charles Connell (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17730958#comment-17730958 ] 

Charles Connell commented on HBASE-27907:
-----------------------------------------

After further examination, I found problems with my testing setup that led to an incorrect conclusion. I now believe netty-tcnative is not advantageous.

> [hbase-thirdparty] Include netty-tcnative in hbase-shaded-netty
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-27907
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27907
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: thirdparty
>            Reporter: Charles Connell
>            Assignee: Charles Connell
>            Priority: Minor
>
> At my company, HubSpot, we are starting to use HBase's TLS support in our clusters. I've done some experiments with different TLS implementations to see which has the best performance.
> I have tested Java 11 without {{{}UseAESCTRInstrinics{}}}, Java 11 with {{{}UseAESCTRInstrinsics{}}}, with and without {{netty-tcnative}} installed, on both {{x86_64}} and {{{}arm64{}}}. I will attach some charts.
> -I have found that using the {{netty-tcnative}} library gives the best performance overall, and I would like to see it included in HBase by default.-
> This ticket is for tracking the change to hbase-thirdparty and producing a new version of that. Another ticket will track the inclusion of that new version in HBase, which requires a few code changes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)