You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com> on 1997/09/12 01:50:31 UTC
Re: os-freebsd/1122 (fwd)
The following reply was made to PR os-freebsd/1122; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
To: Apache bugs database <ap...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: os-freebsd/1122 (fwd)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:45:30 -0600 (MDT)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com
To: marcs@znep.com
Subject: Re: os-freebsd/1122
Marc Slemko writes:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 nsayer@quack.kfu.com wrote:
> > Marc Slemko writes:
> >=20
> > > Good grief. We really don't have the time to be manually=20
> > > jumping through hoops just to respond to you.
> >=20
> > Sorry. You won't have to anymore, though, having done it once.
> > My mailbox signal:noise ratio would be about 1:20 if I didn't
> > do it.
> Oh yea? Every time the status on the PR changes whoever changes it will
> manually have to forward the change to you since it comes from a different
> address. And I have to fix the subject line again for our bug tracking
> system, etc. Quite annoying.=20
*sigh*
> > printf("Content-Type: text/html\n\n");
> Add a fflush(stdout) here. stdout is buffered, so both child and parent
> end up writing it.
Ah. I didn't think of that. Sounds like a bug in FreeBSD's stdio code
then. Perhaps fork() should flush first or something. IMHO it's a
bug if one write results in double traffic just because of a fork.
But it's nothing to do with Apache. Thanks for your time.
--
Nick Sayer http://www.kfu.com/~nsayer/ | Add to /usr/include/sys/errno.h:
nsayer [at] quack [dot] kfu [dot] com |
UNSOLICITED BULK EMAIL IS UNACCEPTABLE | #define EEMACS 666 /* Editor too big */
AND WILL BE CONSIDERED HARASSMENT |