You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2011/01/06 20:22:44 UTC

Bundle and feature identification string

Hi all,

I'm gonna work on two Jira:
- KARAF-33
- KARAF-325

These two tasks require to be able to identify a set of bundles and/or 
features by name and version.

I would like to define the format of this identifier. I propose:
1/ name/version (such as feature-1/0.0.0): it's a kind of maven format
2/ name;version (such as feature-1;0.0.0): it's more OSGi format

I prefer the second one.

WDYT ?

Regards
JB

Re: Bundle and feature identification string

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Andreas,

why not, but I don't wanna lost the users :)

Regards
JB

On 01/06/2011 08:34 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Coulnd't we simply support both? I mean neither of them is an otherwise
> supported char.
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:22:44PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm gonna work on two Jira:
>> - KARAF-33
>> - KARAF-325
>>
>> These two tasks require to be able to identify a set of bundles
>> and/or features by name and version.
>>
>> I would like to define the format of this identifier. I propose:
>> 1/ name/version (such as feature-1/0.0.0): it's a kind of maven format
>> 2/ name;version (such as feature-1;0.0.0): it's more OSGi format
>>
>> I prefer the second one.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB

Re: Bundle and feature identification string

Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Coulnd't we simply support both? I mean neither of them is an otherwise
supported char.

kind regards,
andreas

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:22:44PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm gonna work on two Jira:
> - KARAF-33
> - KARAF-325
> 
> These two tasks require to be able to identify a set of bundles
> and/or features by name and version.
> 
> I would like to define the format of this identifier. I propose:
> 1/ name/version (such as feature-1/0.0.0): it's a kind of maven format
> 2/ name;version (such as feature-1;0.0.0): it's more OSGi format
> 
> I prefer the second one.
> 
> WDYT ?
> 
> Regards
> JB