You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to svn@forrest.apache.org by cr...@apache.org on 2006/06/08 09:11:11 UTC
svn commit: r412681 - /forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml
Author: crossley
Date: Thu Jun 8 00:11:10 2006
New Revision: 412681
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=412681&view=rev
Log:
Add some more missing status entries:
* Reviewed all sitemaps to use locationmap.
* Renamed filenames of core stylesheets to follow a filename convention.
* Added initial whiteboard internal plugin xhtml2.
Modified:
forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml
Modified: forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml?rev=412681&r1=412680&r2=412681&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml (original)
+++ forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml Thu Jun 8 00:11:10 2006
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@
<action dev="RDG" type="add" context="code">
Add new site seeding targets and a new business seed target.
This allows for interactive creation of seed sites - existing
- 'forrest seed' behaviour is unchanged and is equivalent to 'forrest seed-sample'.
+ 'forrest seed' behaviour is unchanged which is equivalent to 'forrest seed-sample'.
New ones are 'forrest seed-business' and 'forrest seed-basic'.
</action>
@@ -258,9 +258,20 @@
"broken-links.xml" so that when building with Forrestbot
you can easily view it.
</action>
+ <action context="code" type="add" dev="RDG" importance="high" fixes-bug="FOR-200">
+ Reviewed all sitemaps to use locationmap references (lm:) and developed
+ a convention for locationmap references.
+ At the same time we changed filenames of core stylesheets to follow
+ a filename convention (e.g. html2document.xsl => html-to-document.xsl)
+ which enables automated locationmap matches.
+ See <link href="site:locationmap">locationmap docs</link>.
+ </action>
<!-- 2005-10 -->
+ <action context="code" type="add" dev="RDG">
+ Added initial whiteboard internal plugin xhtml2. Started work on xhtml in the core.
+ </action>
<action context="code" type="update" dev="JJP">
Upgrade our packaged Cocoon to cocoon-2.2.0-dev-r279987 and enhanced the notes
about how to upgrade.
Re: attributions in status.xml
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> David Crossley escribi??:
> ...
> > We also have a proposal or two in our archives, to use
> > committer Id rather than these RDG, DC, TWW, etc. for
> > the @dev attribute, so probably should not overload it.
>
> I am +1 for using the committer Id.
Me too. However, it has twice arisen in the past and
was not done for some reason. Someone needs to search
the mail archives. IIRC it was done, and then reverted.
-David
Re: attributions in status.xml
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
El vie, 09-06-2006 a las 13:56 +1000, David Crossley escribió:
...
> We also have a proposal or two in our archives, to use
> committer Id rather than these RDG, DC, TWW, etc. for
> the @dev attribute, so probably should not overload it.
I am +1 for using the committer Id.
salu2
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: attributions in status.xml
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> > >Author: crossley
> >
> > >+ <action context="code" type="add" dev="RDG" importance="high"
> > >fixes-bug="FOR-200">
> >
> > Whilst I did do large portion of this work, there were others who
> > contributed and the naming convention was an output from Tim and I on a
> > Forrest Friday.
>
> You were the main instigator. That is why i attributed
> it to you.
>
> The naming convention is already there as a separate
> entry so i will enhance and separate.
>
> Now to your general thrust about group attribution.
>
> Yes, i had agonised for ages about how do do the
> abovementioned entry and some others.
>
> > Is it a good idea (or even possible) to have dev="community" on an
> > action like this?
>
> Yes i reckon that is a good idea. Perhaps also some
> qualifying text on such entries.
Thinking some more about this.
The purpose of that @dev attribute is to note the
committer who went to all that effort to accept the
patch and actually add it to our SVN. Or to convert
a community decision into actual code. This is big,
and deserves attribution. Such efforts are vital.
The @due-to attribute is for thanking contributors
who are not committers.
We also have a proposal or two in our archives, to use
committer Id rather than these RDG, DC, TWW, etc. for
the @dev attribute, so probably should not overload it.
So i have used a mixture of due-to="Community" and
specific text notes for such entries. Perhaps we can
improve this later, but this will get us by for now.
-David
attributions in status.xml
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Ross Gardler wrote:
> >Author: crossley
> >Date: Thu Jun 8 00:11:10 2006
> >New Revision: 412681
>
> ...
>
> >+ <action context="code" type="add" dev="RDG" importance="high"
> >fixes-bug="FOR-200">
> >+ Reviewed all sitemaps to use locationmap references (lm:) and
> >developed
> >+ a convention for locationmap references.
> >+ At the same time we changed filenames of core stylesheets to
> >follow + a filename convention (e.g. html2document.xsl =>
> >html-to-document.xsl)
> >+ which enables automated locationmap matches.
> >+ See <link href="site:locationmap">locationmap docs</link>.
> >+ </action>
>
> Whilst I did do large portion of this work, there were others who
> contributed and the naming convention was an output from Tim and I on a
> Forrest Friday.
You were the main instigator. That is why i attributed
it to you.
The naming convention is already there as a separate
entry so i will enhance and separate.
Now to your general thrust about group attribution.
Yes, i had agonised for ages about how do do the
abovementioned entry and some others.
> Is it a good idea (or even possible) to have dev="community" on an
> action like this?
Yes i reckon that is a good idea. Perhaps also some
qualifying text on such entries.
-David
Re: svn commit: r412681 - /forrest/trunk/site-author/status.xml
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@apache.org>.
crossley@apache.org wrote:
> Author: crossley
> Date: Thu Jun 8 00:11:10 2006
> New Revision: 412681
...
> + <action context="code" type="add" dev="RDG" importance="high" fixes-bug="FOR-200">
> + Reviewed all sitemaps to use locationmap references (lm:) and developed
> + a convention for locationmap references.
> + At the same time we changed filenames of core stylesheets to follow
> + a filename convention (e.g. html2document.xsl => html-to-document.xsl)
> + which enables automated locationmap matches.
> + See <link href="site:locationmap">locationmap docs</link>.
> + </action>
Whilst I did do large portion of this work, there were others who
contributed and the naming convention was an output from Tim and I on a
Forrest Friday.
Is it a good idea (or even possible) to have dev="community" on an
action like this?
Ross