You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-user@logging.apache.org by Roland <wg...@ids.de> on 2013/10/01 08:55:59 UTC
Re: log4j 2 official release date
Very interesting...
All tests were performed with a dual core. But what results can we expect if
single core is used?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40979.html
Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
Re: log4j 2 official release date
Posted by Ralph Goers <rg...@apache.org>.
How common is a single core any more? I suppose it might be common I embedded systems.
Ralph
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Roland <wg...@ids.de> wrote:
>
> Very interesting...
> All tests were performed with a dual core. But what results can we expect if
> single core is used?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/log4j-2-official-release-date-tp40916p40979.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org