You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> on 2008/10/26 07:07:01 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Since our last release just over a month ago, JIRA shows 32 issues
fixed on the 1.2.x branch, and I think it's time to release Continuum
1.2.1.
The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
found here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/
The site is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/
with release notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/release-notes.html
Test results and votes are welcome from everyone in the community.
There are too many combinations of operating systems, scm repositories
and project types for any one person to test, so please try it out in
your environment and let us know what you find-- good or bad.
Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
[ ] +1 Release it!
[ ] +/- 0
[ ] -1 It should not be released because...
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, assuming all goes well
I'll tally the vote and finish up on Wednesday. However, let me know
if you need more time.
Thanks,
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Tomasz Pik <to...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since our last release just over a month ago, JIRA shows 32 issues
> fixed on the 1.2.x branch, and I think it's time to release Continuum
> 1.2.1.
>
> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
> found here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/
>
> The site is staged here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/
> with release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/release-notes.html
>
> Test results and votes are welcome from everyone in the community.
> There are too many combinations of operating systems, scm repositories
> and project types for any one person to test, so please try it out in
> your environment and let us know what you find-- good or bad.
>
> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>
> [X] +1 Release it!
non-binding, works for me perfectly,
Thanks!
Tomek
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
+1
Emmanuel
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since our last release just over a month ago, JIRA shows 32 issues
> fixed on the 1.2.x branch, and I think it's time to release Continuum
> 1.2.1.
>
> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
> found here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/
>
> The site is staged here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/
> with release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/release-notes.html
>
> Test results and votes are welcome from everyone in the community.
> There are too many combinations of operating systems, scm repositories
> and project types for any one person to test, so please try it out in
> your environment and let us know what you find-- good or bad.
>
> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] +/- 0
> [ ] -1 It should not be released because...
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, assuming all goes well
> I'll tally the vote and finish up on Wednesday. However, let me know
> if you need more time.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since our last release just over a month ago, JIRA shows 32 issues
> fixed on the 1.2.x branch, and I think it's time to release Continuum
> 1.2.1.
>
> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
> found here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/
Due to the issue Olivier found, the vote for 1.2.1 is canceled; I'll
stage 1.2.2 and call a new vote.
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Try with this at the end :
// one email
assertEquals( 1, mailSender.getReceivedEmails().size() );
// two recipients
assertEquals( 2, mailSender.getReceivedEmails().get( 0
).getRecipients( Message.RecipientType.TO ).length );
--
Olivier
2008/10/28 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>> My vote here is +0 (I don't want to block a release but it looks to me
>> as a regression and the fix has been committed)
>
> Hi Olivier. It's no problem to do a 1.2.2, but I'd like to have a
> test for your change first.
>
> After chatting with you on irc I gave it a try involving lots of copy
> and paste, but my test always fails saying that only one email was
> received when two were expected. :(
> http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MailContinuumNotifierTest
>
> I updated the commit log messages on r708339 (branch) and r708342
> (trunk) to mention CONTINUUM-1944, which I opened (and closed) for
> this problem.
>
> And because I always forget how to do this...
>
> $ svn log -r708341:708342
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r708342 | olamy | 2008-10-27 14:58:37 -0700 (Mon, 27 Oct 2008) | 1 line
>
> merge -r708338:708339 from 1.2.x branch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> $ svn propset -r708342 --revprop svn:log "[CONTINUUM-1944] fix
> multiple notifiers element declaration in pom. merged -r708338:708339
> from 1.2.x branch."
> property 'svn:log' set on repository revision 708342
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> My vote here is +0 (I don't want to block a release but it looks to me
> as a regression and the fix has been committed)
Hi Olivier. It's no problem to do a 1.2.2, but I'd like to have a
test for your change first.
After chatting with you on irc I gave it a try involving lots of copy
and paste, but my test always fails saying that only one email was
received when two were expected. :(
http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MailContinuumNotifierTest
I updated the commit log messages on r708339 (branch) and r708342
(trunk) to mention CONTINUUM-1944, which I opened (and closed) for
this problem.
And because I always forget how to do this...
$ svn log -r708341:708342
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r708342 | olamy | 2008-10-27 14:58:37 -0700 (Mon, 27 Oct 2008) | 1 line
merge -r708338:708339 from 1.2.x branch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ svn propset -r708342 --revprop svn:log "[CONTINUUM-1944] fix
multiple notifiers element declaration in pom. merged -r708338:708339
from 1.2.x branch."
property 'svn:log' set on repository revision 708342
Thanks,
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
My vote here is +0 (I don't want to block a release but it looks to me
as a regression and the fix has been committed)
--
Olivier
2008/10/27 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
> I have found an issue introduced by me (argh my bad!).
> It's fixed in rev 708339.
>
> This issue prevents to have this declaration in a pom :
>
> <notifier>
> <configuration>
> <address>foo@foo.org</address>
> </configuration>
> </notifier>
> <notifier>
> <configuration>
> <address>bar@bar.org</address>
> </configuration>
> </notifier>
>
> Only the last one receive the email.
>
> --
> Olivier
> PS : btw cool issue no build failure during one day in my company :-))
> (only one people received it and he is on vacation :-) )
>
> 2008/10/26 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
>> Since our last release just over a month ago, JIRA shows 32 issues
>> fixed on the 1.2.x branch, and I think it's time to release Continuum
>> 1.2.1.
>>
>> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
>> found here:
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/
>>
>> The site is staged here:
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/
>> with release notes:
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/release-notes.html
>>
>> Test results and votes are welcome from everyone in the community.
>> There are too many combinations of operating systems, scm repositories
>> and project types for any one person to test, so please try it out in
>> your environment and let us know what you find-- good or bad.
>>
>> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release it!
>> [ ] +/- 0
>> [ ] -1 It should not be released because...
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, assuming all goes well
>> I'll tally the vote and finish up on Wednesday. However, let me know
>> if you need more time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Continuum 1.2.1
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I have found an issue introduced by me (argh my bad!).
It's fixed in rev 708339.
This issue prevents to have this declaration in a pom :
<notifier>
<configuration>
<address>foo@foo.org</address>
</configuration>
</notifier>
<notifier>
<configuration>
<address>bar@bar.org</address>
</configuration>
</notifier>
Only the last one receive the email.
--
Olivier
PS : btw cool issue no build failure during one day in my company :-))
(only one people received it and he is on vacation :-) )
2008/10/26 Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>:
> Since our last release just over a month ago, JIRA shows 32 issues
> fixed on the 1.2.x branch, and I think it's time to release Continuum
> 1.2.1.
>
> The binaries, sources, checksums, signatures and staging repo can be
> found here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/
>
> The site is staged here:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/
> with release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/continuum/1.2.1/docs/release-notes.html
>
> Test results and votes are welcome from everyone in the community.
> There are too many combinations of operating systems, scm repositories
> and project types for any one person to test, so please try it out in
> your environment and let us know what you find-- good or bad.
>
> Once you've had a chance to review it, please vote
>
> [ ] +1 Release it!
> [ ] +/- 0
> [ ] -1 It should not be released because...
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, assuming all goes well
> I'll tally the vote and finish up on Wednesday. However, let me know
> if you need more time.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
>