You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/03/13 00:01:32 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17939] New: -
WarpEngine doesn't support defaultHost + patch
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17939>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17939
WarpEngine doesn't support defaultHost + patch
Summary: WarpEngine doesn't support defaultHost + patch
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.18
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: Connector:Webapp
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: karl@xk72.com
The WarpEngine doesn't use the defaultHost parameter. I would like to use
defaultHost so that I can activate autoDeploy,liveDeploy,deployXML for the
WarpConnector hosts without having to configure a separate host for each
virtual host.
Have patched WarpConfigurationHandler.java to add this functionality:
65a66
> import org.apache.catalina.Engine;
262a264,272
> if (host==null) {
> // Try to use defaultHost
> String defaultHost = ((Engine)container).getDefaultHost();
> if ( defaultHost != null ) {
> host = (Host)container.findChild
(defaultHost.toLowerCase());
> if (Constants.DEBUG)
> logger.debug("Using defaultHost for "+hostName);
> }
> }
This works well on my development server... I'm not sure why new hosts are
automatically created rather than using a defaultHost scenario in
WarpConfigurationHandler currently - maybe I'm missing something.
cheers,
k@rl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org