You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de> on 2003/02/19 04:07:44 UTC
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support apxs.in
* nd@apache.org wrote:
> nd 2003/02/18 19:01:21
>
> Modified: . CHANGES
> support apxs.in
> Log:
> insert LoadModule directives only outside of sections.
>
> PR: 9012
Hmm, I'm unsure. Is it desired to backport such changes? I'm asking,
because the Bugreport was for 1.3 ...
TIA, nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =>__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support apxs.in
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Yet, I entertain
> no hope of understanding the perl-fu you used. (I might be able to
> test it lightly, but I doubt that's enough to merit a +1.)
I hope, the additional explanations will help ;-)
nd
--
Flhacs wird im Usenet grundsätzlich alsfhc geschrieben. Schreibt man
lafhsc nicht slfach, so ist das schlichtweg hclafs. Hingegen darf man
rihctig ruhig rhitcgi schreiben, weil eine shcalfe Schreibweise bei
irhictg nicht als shflac angesehen wird. -- Hajo Pflüger in dnq
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support apxs.in
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:07 AM +0100 André Malo
<nd...@perlig.de> wrote:
> * nd@apache.org wrote:
>
>> nd 2003/02/18 19:01:21
>>
>> Modified: . CHANGES
>> support apxs.in
>> Log:
>> insert LoadModule directives only outside of sections.
>>
>> PR: 9012
>
> Hmm, I'm unsure. Is it desired to backport such changes? I'm
> asking, because the Bugreport was for 1.3 ...
Totally. This one has been a nuisance for a while. Yet, I entertain
no hope of understanding the perl-fu you used. (I might be able to
test it lightly, but I doubt that's enough to merit a +1.)
*me hugs python* -- justin