You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drat.apache.org by Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> on 2020/07/08 15:45:55 UTC
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Hi,
It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
continue ASF development on DRAT.
If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
more than simple consideration there.
Thank you for your consideration.
Chris
From: Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>
Reply-To: "private@drat.apache.org" <pr...@drat.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 5:37 AM
To: "magicaltrout@apache.org" <ma...@apache.org>
Cc: "private@drat.apache.org" <pr...@drat.apache.org>, "board@apache.org" <bo...@apache.org>, "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Dear Tom Barber and all DRAT contributors,
The board report for DRAT has not yet been submitted for this month's
board meeting. It is due today. The report was also missing in May and June.
The board needs to know whether the project is alive and viable. I will
monitor dev@drat.apache.org from now until the board meeting next week.
I ask anyone who is active in the DRAT project to post there as soon as
possible to establish communication between DRAT and the board.
The best outcome would be if a PMC member or members can prepare and
submit a report describing the project's status. Please contact me if
you need any assistance.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.apache.org_foundation_board_reporting-23how&d=DwICaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=nDJTWrONcD-1YbPcG9rYTPl6y-222GEuLwgnd2gvO7U&s=mbLfGZljpUdMFilVwq8qx9eDhrlR_59v3IbyPwi2zig&e=
Thanks,
Patricia Shanahan
(on behalf of the ASF Board)
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwICaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=nDJTWrONcD-1YbPcG9rYTPl6y-222GEuLwgnd2gvO7U&s=5e990sTUEGqoLDmNSWzp1llwBohGz_kVmBCZxzcbcNo&e=
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Karanjeet Singh <co...@gmail.com>.
I have *no* objection to that
Karanjeet
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:46 AM Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>
>
>
> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
> more than simple consideration there.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>
> Reply-To: "private@drat.apache.org" <pr...@drat.apache.org>
> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 5:37 AM
> To: "magicaltrout@apache.org" <ma...@apache.org>
> Cc: "private@drat.apache.org" <pr...@drat.apache.org>, "board@apache.org"
> <bo...@apache.org>, "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>
>
>
> Dear Tom Barber and all DRAT contributors,
>
>
>
> The board report for DRAT has not yet been submitted for this month's
>
> board meeting. It is due today. The report was also missing in May and
> June.
>
>
>
> The board needs to know whether the project is alive and viable. I will
>
> monitor dev@drat.apache.org from now until the board meeting next week.
>
> I ask anyone who is active in the DRAT project to post there as soon as
>
> possible to establish communication between DRAT and the board.
>
>
>
> The best outcome would be if a PMC member or members can prepare and
>
> submit a report describing the project's status. Please contact me if
>
> you need any assistance.
>
>
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.apache.org_foundation_board_reporting-23how&d=DwICaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=nDJTWrONcD-1YbPcG9rYTPl6y-222GEuLwgnd2gvO7U&s=mbLfGZljpUdMFilVwq8qx9eDhrlR_59v3IbyPwi2zig&e=
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Patricia Shanahan
>
>
>
> (on behalf of the ASF Board)
>
>
>
> --
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwICaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=nDJTWrONcD-1YbPcG9rYTPl6y-222GEuLwgnd2gvO7U&s=5e990sTUEGqoLDmNSWzp1llwBohGz_kVmBCZxzcbcNo&e=
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>.
On 7/8/2020 1:52 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> I will commit to filing that report. When is it due?
Thanks.
Technically, it is due today, one week before the board meeting.
Usually, I would say wait for next month, but given the long gap, and
the progress towards resolving the situation, I think a late report
would be preferred, so any time in the next few days.
>
> *From: *Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 1:47 PM
> *To: *"dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>, Chris Mattmann
> <ma...@apache.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>
> There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a
>
> resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being
>
> imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm
>
> the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like
>
> Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next
>
> month?
>
> On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>
> Thank you Roy.
>
> Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
>
> Appreciated and will await the outcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com <ma...@gbiv.com>>
>
> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
>
> To: Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
>
> Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org <ma...@drat.apache.org>"
> <dev@drat.apache.org <ma...@drat.apache.org>>
>
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
>
> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>
> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
>
> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
>
> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
>
> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
>
> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
>
> more than simple consideration there.
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
> Chris
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
>
> on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
>
> allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
>
> as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> ....Roy
>
> --
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=LhHEGn8yZ4g2ET3DmLxLvEsW5qyCYSPLPS24gP_2YwI&s=OfikUJ_zHYgXwilGh_2M-VtWcvKcPhqTJ1aTt8WW87M&e=
>
>
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>.
I will commit to filing that report. When is it due?
From: Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 1:47 PM
To: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a
resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being
imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm
the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like
Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next
month?
On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
Thank you Roy.
Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
Appreciated and will await the outcome.
Thanks,
Chris
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
To: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
continue ASF development on DRAT.
If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
more than simple consideration there.
Thank you for your consideration.
Chris
Hi Chris,
Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
Cheers,
....Roy
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=LhHEGn8yZ4g2ET3DmLxLvEsW5qyCYSPLPS24gP_2YwI&s=OfikUJ_zHYgXwilGh_2M-VtWcvKcPhqTJ1aTt8WW87M&e=
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>.
And so people have the link +1 from me:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2020-07-15/Terminate-DRAT
Terminate DRAT
info
· navigation
WHEREAS, the Project Management Committee of the Apache DRAT project
has arrived at a consensus to recommend moving the project to the
Attic; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it no longer in the best interest
of the Foundation to continue the Apache DRAT project due to
inactivity;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Apache DRAT project is hereby
terminated; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Attic PMC be and hereby is tasked with oversight
over the software developed by the Apache DRAT Project; and be it
further
RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache DRAT" is hereby
terminated; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Apache DRAT PMC is hereby terminated.
[ Terminate the Apache DRAT Project
approved:
comments:
rtf: Placeholder pending discussion on dev list.
]
Report Info
Attach
7D
Links
Roster
Prior Reports
From: Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>
Reply-To: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 4:41 PM
To: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
Cc: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Excellent. DRAT PMC members please review Roy's resolution, and if you
agree with it we are done.
On 7/8/2020 4:36 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Heh, sorry, while Patricia was sending that, I was drafting a
resolution for the agenda so that you wouldn't need to later.
It is on the agenda now, but we can postpone action if there
is any doubts by next week.
....Roy
On Jul 8, 2020, at 1:47 PM, Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> wrote:
There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next month?
On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
Thank you Roy.
Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
Appreciated and will await the outcome.
Thanks,
Chris
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
To: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
continue ASF development on DRAT.
If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
more than simple consideration there.
Thank you for your consideration.
Chris
Hi Chris,
Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
Cheers,
....Roy
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=0Gai25MtfPTd_g8fZPtkRIucn_t2cr6Jx0xHIRMIIGM&s=LCM-fURe7vLr6dJmzDTvw4Fw2fqt2FvJaMf8ITMK6xo&e=
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>.
Excellent. DRAT PMC members please review Roy's resolution, and if you
agree with it we are done.
On 7/8/2020 4:36 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Heh, sorry, while Patricia was sending that, I was drafting a
> resolution for the agenda so that you wouldn't need to later.
> It is on the agenda now, but we can postpone action if there
> is any doubts by next week.
>
> ....Roy
>
>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 1:47 PM, Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next month?
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>>> Thank you Roy.
>>> Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
>>> Appreciated and will await the outcome.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
>>> To: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
>>> Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
>>> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>>> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
>>> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
>>> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
>>> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
>>> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
>>> more than simple consideration there.
>>> Thank you for your consideration.
>>> Chris
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
>>> on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
>>> allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
>>> as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
>>> Cheers,
>>> ....Roy
>>>
>>
>> --
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>> https://www.avg.com
>>
>
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
Heh, sorry, while Patricia was sending that, I was drafting a
resolution for the agenda so that you wouldn't need to later.
It is on the agenda now, but we can postpone action if there
is any doubts by next week.
....Roy
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 1:47 PM, Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> wrote:
>
> There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next month?
>
>
> On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>> Thank you Roy.
>> Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
>> Appreciated and will await the outcome.
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
>> To: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
>> Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
>> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
>> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
>> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
>> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
>> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
>> more than simple consideration there.
>> Thank you for your consideration.
>> Chris
>> Hi Chris,
>> Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
>> on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
>> allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
>> as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
>> Cheers,
>> ....Roy
>>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>.
There seems to be a developing consensus. Ultimately, we will need a
resolution which would be better coming from the PMC rather than being
imposed by the board. You may need more time to prepare it and confirm
the consensus. If so, perhaps a very simple report saying something like
Apache DRAT is not active and the PMC plans to offer a resolution next
month?
On 7/8/2020 10:15 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Thank you Roy.
>
>
>
> Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
>
> Appreciated and will await the outcome.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
> To: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
> Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>
>
>
> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
> more than simple consideration there.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
>
> Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
>
> on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
>
> allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
>
> as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> ....Roy
>
>
>
>
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>.
Thank you Roy.
Yeah just DRAT would be fine.
Appreciated and will await the outcome.
Thanks,
Chris
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 10:13 AM
To: Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org>
Cc: "dev@drat.apache.org" <de...@drat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
continue ASF development on DRAT.
If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
more than simple consideration there.
Thank you for your consideration.
Chris
Hi Chris,
Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
Cheers,
....Roy
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>
> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
> more than simple consideration there.
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
> Chris
Hi Chris,
Generally speaking, that's the default, since stopping further work
on a project is equivalent to abandoning the mark, and we always
allow people to fork Apache repos. I don't think anyone would mind
as long as it isn't packaged as "Apache DRAT". DRAT is fine.
Cheers,
....Roy
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Am 08.07.20 um 17:48 schrieb Tyler Bui-Palsulich:
> That would be OK with me.
+1
Cheers,
Phil
Re: [EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
Posted by Tyler Bui-Palsulich <tb...@gmail.com>.
That would be OK with me.
Tyler
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020, 8:46 AM Chris Mattmann <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It’s possible that we may not in fact have enough interest to
> continue ASF development on DRAT.
>
>
>
> If that is the case I would request that should the project be spun
> down and committee terminated that the ASF would consider simply
> transferring the repo back to me under my GitHub where it originally
> came from. To my knowledge we never requested trademark or
> anything like that on it, so hopefully it’s not entangled in anything
> more than simple consideration there.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>
> *Reply-To: *"private@drat.apache.org" <pr...@drat.apache.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 5:37 AM
> *To: *"magicaltrout@apache.org" <ma...@apache.org>
> *Cc: *"private@drat.apache.org" <pr...@drat.apache.org>, "
> board@apache.org" <bo...@apache.org>, "dev@drat.apache.org" <
> dev@drat.apache.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Missing DRAT Board Report
>
>
>
> Dear Tom Barber and all DRAT contributors,
>
>
>
> The board report for DRAT has not yet been submitted for this month's
>
> board meeting. It is due today. The report was also missing in May and
> June.
>
>
>
> The board needs to know whether the project is alive and viable. I will
>
> monitor dev@drat.apache.org from now until the board meeting next week.
>
> I ask anyone who is active in the DRAT project to post there as soon as
>
> possible to establish communication between DRAT and the board.
>
>
>
> The best outcome would be if a PMC member or members can prepare and
>
> submit a report describing the project's status. Please contact me if
>
> you need any assistance.
>
>
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.apache.org_foundation_board_reporting-23how&d=DwICaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=nDJTWrONcD-1YbPcG9rYTPl6y-222GEuLwgnd2gvO7U&s=mbLfGZljpUdMFilVwq8qx9eDhrlR_59v3IbyPwi2zig&e=
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Patricia Shanahan
>
>
>
> (on behalf of the ASF Board)
>
>
>
> --
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avg.com&d=DwICaQ&c=frcPxg8b67XqRBSg4Sq0SNY3JWw9kiBusXbl0-DuPio&r=tTX9GwR3d0ryE_Yj4qfvSvV26IOGLlTWuGNbA-6jU7E&m=nDJTWrONcD-1YbPcG9rYTPl6y-222GEuLwgnd2gvO7U&s=5e990sTUEGqoLDmNSWzp1llwBohGz_kVmBCZxzcbcNo&e=
>
>
>
>
>